roptsa Wrote:TB Wrote:It means that in comparision with other industrialized nations, a higher percentage of residents of Japan were born in the main islands proper, or born in 日本列島. Whereas other nations have more foreign-born persons in their population.
Certainly China has them beat, then? I've yet to hear of the homogeneity of the People's Republic of China or Hong Kong. What about North Korea or Somalia? Wait those aren't industrialized are they? Why the *** do only industrialized countries count? I want to be homogeneous too!
I don't think so,
the ratio of Han ethnicity to others in China is not nearly as pronounced as that of the native-born Yamato people to non-天孫民族. Hong Kong is really small... North Korea is the personal manor of Kim Jong Il, Somalia is Hell on earth...
I'm not sure why you wrote you want to be homogenous too... As to why you haven't heard of those other places it's probably because those other places (other than Hong Kong, which isn't and never was an independent nation) aren't as industrialized as Japan or the rest of the First World (Capitalist World of the Cold War Era).
And why do only industrialized nations receive such scrutiny? Because the Anglophone world, England, Canada, America, Austrialia, etc. is mostly industrialized nations and they like to study themselves and compare themselves to others like themselves. Unless you can read ethnological publications in Chinese or something, Japan as homogenous will be a major theme in East Asian-related ethnological, sociological (or related) publications/discussions.
Quote:Quote:Not every society looks at North America and its melting pot of cultures and thinks, "that's a great idea!"
Not even America thinks that. We be not as progressive as we seems. Me thinks.
America is pathetic when it comes to race issues. Progressive + America (of the present) don't typically belong in the same book, much less the same discussion.
@Jarvik
I'm not sure about this...
Jarvik7 Wrote:They are not "banned from Japan" when they accept the money for a return ticket, they just lose the special visa that they received.
According to the bill, it appears as if they lose to ability to not only return unless the Diet legislates that the economy has improved, but that they also lose their ability to apply as Nisei, and instead have to apply as
Foreign Aliens under Japanese nationality laws. If this is correct, then the "blood money" will remove any "blood connection" these "Nisei" have with the "Yamato people."
Jarvik7 Wrote:I think it's actually pretty generous that the government is willing to pay.
For them to GTFO regardless of whether they have work waiting for them in Brazil? I think the gesture may
appear to have the effect of taking them from a jobless environment, but I'm sure the many right-wingers in the Japanese Diet wouldn't give a rip if these Brazilians were being shipped to the bottom of the Ocean.
Jarvik7 Wrote:If anything the creation of the nisei-visa is much more xenophobic than paying them to go home when the work is gone. The thinking was that foreigners of Japanese descent would be less trouble than using other foreigners. It's obvious in retrospect that this thinking was flawed since culture comes from one's surroundings, not from blood.
The Nisei visa is definately xenophobic and eugenics-tastic. The idea that citizenship or nationality has or should have anything to do with "blood" is simply laughable and empirically false on every level. These laws will hopefully be reformed soon by popular referendum, but I doubt it...
If Japanese people of 100% Japanese "blood" are treated like this (providing the bill does strip them of Nisei status in future visa applications), imagine how hateful some of these politicians must be (and are willing to legislate on) with regards to
"real" or "worse" gaijin.
Edited: 2009-07-29, 8:04 pm