I have to laugh about being "reported" for 1542. I could care less, but I maintain there is absolutely *nothing* there worthy of a "report". Yup, I changed the keyword, and noted it, and it's a perfectly valid change that every dictionary I've seen supports better than the original.
1247? Ah, perhaps one could quibble with the connotation I've given to "copy". But there ain't a darn thing wrong with the story or the primitives, really.
Some bells go off pretty easy.
1247? Ah, perhaps one could quibble with the connotation I've given to "copy". But there ain't a darn thing wrong with the story or the primitives, really.
Some bells go off pretty easy.
