Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,635
Thanks:
0
You understood the text well.
Yeah, it seems crazy. But I the frequencies they talk about are inside the range of human voice. 60Hz - 1000Hz. But audible sound is 20Hz - 20000Hz, so I'm still inclined to think this is just BS.
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 713
Thanks:
0
I've heard that theory before. Apparently it's some kind of lame excuse that some Japanese that have not been able to learn English successfully have made up to explain why they couldn't possibly have succeeded.
It's so ridiculous that it's hard to believe that some people take it seriously.
I guess it's nice to have an excuse.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,009
Thanks:
1
Not ridiculous. An excuse, yes. But not ridiculous. Some people think perfect pitch is something we are born with. There are people who have gone through training and proved this wrong.
After a certain age the amount of listening and training necessary to distinguish "foreign" sounds should, theoretically, go up. More time required gives appearance of difficulty. "Appearance" is everything.
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 273
Thanks:
0
Is this the "English sounds that cannot be heard by the Japanese ear" and vice-versa myth? It's almost funny O_o
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,635
Thanks:
0
Well, then it is one more good reason to do AJATT.
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 98
Thanks:
0
I think anyone with basic knowledge of acoustics will immediately understand this is BS.
To give an indication, telephones typically only transmit frequencies under 3000 Hz, which is pretty lo-fi, but as we know, it's more than sufficient for intelligable speech in English, or any language.
Acoustically, most natural sounds comprise not a single frequency, but a range of frequencies. Hissy sounds like English S, T, and F or Japanese S/T have a lot of high-frequency content and if you couldn't hear high frequencies it would be difficult to distinguish, say, デ from テ. More pure tones (vowels) have most of their energy in the lower frequencies, but well below 2000 Hz, which is beyond soprano range. If you could only hear 2000-12000 Hz, you'd go insane because it's pretty grating.
I don't think anyone is actually taking this "theory" seriously, but if you want I'll post a frequency response graph of English & Japanese speech. But without even doing the graphs, I can tell you they'll be pretty much the same regardless of language.
Besides, is there any doubt that the record for highest-pitched voice must be held by a Japanese woman?