Hi, I want to use an SRS (Anki) for my acupuncture school studies but have a few questions about how to best formulate my cards as most of the stuff I need to memorize has a lot of related facts per "item" of study.
I've read that each SRS card should have one Q with only one possible answer (1Q:1A) but I'm not sure this makes sense for my field.
What I want to know is:
Can I test multiple pieces of data on each card (1 broad Q:A1-2-3-4-5...) even though it means I'll review certain aspects of data more often than necessary?
For example:
Chinese medicine looks at patterns of disharmony rather than specific diseases.
One such pattern is TYaC.
For the TYaC pattern I need to memorize the Qi pathways associated with it, where in the body it hits, what the key symptoms are (which could be 10-20 or more), what the pulse is and what the tongue looks like.
Usually these various aspects make a supportive whole--for example, the pulse + tongue make sense given the symptoms (and vice-versa) as well as where the disharmony hits the body the hardest, etc.
It will make card-making easier to test all related info in the answer section at once (as there is a boatload of stuff to learn). And it seems to make sense to test 1 broad Q:A1-2-3-4-5... because I'll be recalling various aspects of the TYaC pattern just to answer any one specific question anyway.
BUT if I test each card for ALL of the info in the answer section I will probably get some of the info right but not all of it. It will make determining when to pass a card and at what level trickier. Also, when the question comes up again I'll see the data I got right on it sooner than necessary. So I'm still uncertain as to what is the best way to SRS this data.
Has anyone else used an SRS to memorize things with a lot of related parts, and if so what worked best for you in terms of formulating Qs & As?
Is it best to SRS-test things in one-fact bites (1Q:1A) even for this kind of data?
Thanks for your help and suggestions.
I've read that each SRS card should have one Q with only one possible answer (1Q:1A) but I'm not sure this makes sense for my field.
What I want to know is:
Can I test multiple pieces of data on each card (1 broad Q:A1-2-3-4-5...) even though it means I'll review certain aspects of data more often than necessary?
For example:
Chinese medicine looks at patterns of disharmony rather than specific diseases.
One such pattern is TYaC.
For the TYaC pattern I need to memorize the Qi pathways associated with it, where in the body it hits, what the key symptoms are (which could be 10-20 or more), what the pulse is and what the tongue looks like.
Usually these various aspects make a supportive whole--for example, the pulse + tongue make sense given the symptoms (and vice-versa) as well as where the disharmony hits the body the hardest, etc.
It will make card-making easier to test all related info in the answer section at once (as there is a boatload of stuff to learn). And it seems to make sense to test 1 broad Q:A1-2-3-4-5... because I'll be recalling various aspects of the TYaC pattern just to answer any one specific question anyway.
BUT if I test each card for ALL of the info in the answer section I will probably get some of the info right but not all of it. It will make determining when to pass a card and at what level trickier. Also, when the question comes up again I'll see the data I got right on it sooner than necessary. So I'm still uncertain as to what is the best way to SRS this data.
Has anyone else used an SRS to memorize things with a lot of related parts, and if so what worked best for you in terms of formulating Qs & As?
Is it best to SRS-test things in one-fact bites (1Q:1A) even for this kind of data?
Thanks for your help and suggestions.
