Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 66
Thanks:
0
Every time I encounter a story that is really visual (and thus a class a mnemonic) but has some sort of sexual reference - or any form of political incorrectness - in it, it always has some bad ratings (along with many good ones, of course). I don't get that.
Oeweoeoe it has sex, oeweoeoe it's misogynistic. Who cares? Make it vivid, make it stick, that's what's important.
Technically, it does not really matter as it is usually compensated so you see them anyway or you adapt the story to fit your needs, but hey I'm procrastinating and it bothered me. :)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,541
Thanks:
4
Because I don't have kids I don't really understand it myself, but one thing people are worried about is things being exposed to children. Many people are worried about their own children in particular. Nevertheless, I agree with you.
It's hard for me to say whether it is good to prevent kids from seeing certain content. More difficult is figuring out which content should be filtered, and when it is appropriate. However, I can still agree with you without knowing these answers because I think that parents really don't have much of a choice in the matter. As long as technology progresses at a certain pace, and that technology is providing a wide range of different content available to everyone, and the way to use the new technology is innovative, there's no way parents can keep up. Somehow you have to face the fact that your kid is gonna see more awful, great, sexy--you name it--things than you've ever dreamed of (if he/she chooses to do so). As long as kids understand the technology better than you do, they'll get whatever content they want.
I also fail to see how a dirty story is going to destroy anyone's moral foundation. All and all the morality we choose to follow is probably not based on when we were introduced to dirty stories. Just a thought.
Edited: 2009-04-06, 9:58 am
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 713
Thanks:
0
Oh no!, Not that debate again! /o\
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 99
Thanks:
0
I think some stories are mistakenly reported as the report button is between the star and copy buttons and they click on it by mistake.
Many people probably do not realise that you can undo a mistaken report by clicking on the report buton again. They are probably too scared to click on report again.
As for those of the sexual nature I don't really have an issue with them and chuckle to myself when i see the number of reports. Are people really that sensitive?
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,533
Thanks:
0
Some of us find 'sex' stories to be vulgar and distasteful as well, even ignoring the 'children' angle.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,851
Thanks:
0
Even trying to make the site child-friendly is stupid and dangerous. The minute you present yourself as that you open yourself up to lawsuits as soon as something, no matter how small, slips through. If you really wanted to go that route you'd need to hire moderators to watch the stories & forums 24/7.
Being non-offensive is another thing, but everyone has a different level of tolerance.
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,541
Thanks:
4
I just had a thought about how easy self-regulation would be. If you put (WARNING: ADULT) at the beginning of a story on the dirtier side of things, it will give people who don't want to read it the opportunity to avoid it. I added it to my only story that is a bit dirty.
For now I'll keep it that way, though I'm going to think over whether or not it is actually a good idea. The story I added it to is just a sexual reference (my story for PACKED), and I wonder if putting a big warning sign in front of something like that is just helping reinforce the idea that sex is dirty. A very popular idea in America it seems!
Edited: 2009-04-06, 7:52 pm
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 183
Thanks:
0
I think there are a bunch of wierd religos using this site, because I also often see things reported which contain evolution, sacrifice, paganism and other things along those lines
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 477
Thanks:
0
I got a couple of Mormon missionaries at my door today, and as usual, they left as soon as I told them I am a Zen. They asked me if I believe in God and I said I'm Zen and that'd be depending on how they define God and they left! Dude wait, I want to talk with you about your God! But yea, talking to a Zen guy about God is pretty much waste of their time as I would probably ask them things like definition of God and Heaven and Time and Space and start saying things like I and you exist but we really don't, existence is illusion and illusion does exist, and so on. I understand.
Wait, what was the point?? yea, there is a saying in Japanese
毒にも薬にもならない
if it doesn't offend anybody, it will be tepid to everybody.
Sorry, this is so irrelevant but I couldn't resist. I blame wccrawford for
putting 'sex' in quotes. I'm a weak man.
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,635
Thanks:
0
Let's see. You are sugesting that we create 2 ways to rate stories?
1 for how offensive it is, 1 for how christian it is not?