Joined: May 2008
Posts: 548
Thanks:
0
So I've counted at least a dozen times, and I simply cannot get more than 14 strokes out of this kanji. It's made up of 竹, which is six strokes, and 者, which is eight. Yet both RTK and Kanjidic give 15 as the stroke count.
Is this an error? If not, where does the extra stroke come from?
~J
My computer shows it with 15 strokes as well.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,582
Thanks:
0
What's the consensus here on stroke counts? I've yet to use them in my studies.
Edited: 2009-01-29, 3:37 pm
As far as I know, stroke count is only needed for looking up kanji in traditional dictionaries
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 548
Thanks:
0
"Consensus" in what sense? My main use for them is to ensure that I've actually gotten a character correct when "air-writing"; it's handy for that, and I try to remember counts for common radicals so I can look them up in dictionaries (not just traditional ones, dictionaries that allow search-by-arbitrary-radical usually group radicals by stroke count), but I'm not sure there's much explicit use for them otherwise (since if you can write the character you can obtain the stroke count).
~J