Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9
Thanks:
0
Hi everyone, first post here.
I tried searching the forums for something like this but i must just suck at forum searching or something; because i couldn't find anything.
I am currently working through RTK 1 and have almost reached the first milestone, that is the 1/4 mark.
But I was just wondering, after RTK 1 and 3 how do you learn to read?
Edited: 2009-01-26, 4:13 pm
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,879
Thanks:
19
It also helps to study grammar. Kanji is important, but it isn't everything. If you can't understand all the various conjugations, you're going to be confused a lot.
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 887
Thanks:
0
What happened to just reading books and comics? That's what I did, I read stuff and put sentences in to Anki. You'll learn the readings pretty easily this way. I also didn't bother to learn the conjugations or grammar, either, and I can read most things without too much trouble.
I wrote more tips for beginners on my website under my name, if you're interested.
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 548
Thanks:
0
I learned explicit grammar rules. It helped, but because I never tried it any other way I can't give useful feedback as to whether it was more valuable than just spending that time reading simple material.
~J
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9
Thanks:
0
I thought i replied to this again, obviously not.
Anyway, thankyou once again for your replies and alyks i'll check out your site too.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,582
Thanks:
0
Hey 十九, what did you mean about trying to imprint the conjugations in your brain? Instead of doing that, maybe try just getting a feel from the explanations about how/why the words change, when studying the example sentences in Anki and 'reverse engineering' them. Just follow that process and it'll become second nature rather quickly. Unless that's what you meant, already.
Edited: 2009-01-28, 4:24 pm
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 57
Thanks:
0
I wouldn't worry about conjugations of verbs in Japanese. They are easy. You basically have just two tenses: present and past. There is not 1st, 2nd, 3rd person, singular or plural. That's it. OK there is some conditional, etc. but you will pick that up through natural acquisition. Even if you study it, it probably won't come out right. Reading, watching TV, real conversations will give you a sense for those kinds of things, e.g. tara and nara, etc.; I couldn't explain the rules but I have a natural sense for what is correct.
If you like studying grammar go ahead but I would suggest reading first and if you don't get something grammar take that point up.
日本語の動詞は簡単だよ、文法も。心配しなくて。。。
Edited: 2009-01-28, 5:57 pm
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 9
Thanks:
0
Ah i didn't mean much by saying that, i guess i didn't think about how it could be read when i posted.
I don't really read the grammar explanations as such, just skip straight to the example sentences and read and try to understand, sometimes i look at the rough translations to give hints etc. (I'll be honest i didn't even know what a conjugation was for a while, until i actually read one of Tae kims explanations, which just confused me so i stopped doing that)
I will start to use anki for sentences once i have completed RTK 1 but for now i will just read sentences as i come across them in my spare time since it takes up enough of my time keeping up with the RTK reviews.
It's taken roughly a week for me to reach kanji 500 in RTK so i should be onto sentences very soon.
Another thing i like to do is try to read through the サムライ・チャンプルー manga, although i can't understand much of it at this time ive quite enjoyed flicking through the pages and taking things as they come.
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,289
Thanks:
0
It's pretty obvious that many in this topic has misunderstood what grammar is meant for. You don't learn the grammatical terms to ask Japanese people questions. You learn them to be able to discuss a language as a science. If you want to discuss and compare languages, you need a vocabulary framework. Introducing: Grammar.
"You know, I used that saseru form of that word used to indicate action to indicate that the person saying the sen"... no, let's not go there.
Musigny, I never said Japanese was hard. I said there's a lot to the grammar, and compared to tons of languages, in particular Chinese, there is. I've studied latin, I know about verb conjugation in French. It really doesn't affect what I wrote.
As for Japanese being monotone... I guess your exposure hasn't introduced you to pitch in Japanese, my textbooks did. If you speak Japanese words in a monotone way, you're pronouncing them wrong, pitch is important in Japanese. It's how you tell the difference between 雨 and 飴 for example. Not saying it's something you have to explicitly study, it comes naturally as you listen/speak a lot of Japanese. It's however a hard part of the language you're ignoring simply because you haven't been introduced to it.
I think Swedish, my native language, is easy as crap, I don't need any grammar. If YOU want to learn it however, you will quickly notice that pretty much all swedish words has several versions. a big house = ett stort hus. a big person = en stor person. Why en and not ett? Why a t after stor in one case, not the other? Can you learn this from exposure? Sure, I did. Is it faster to simply learn that there are two kinds of words (genus like in fench), Neuter and Common? Yeah, it certainly gives you a LOT more understanding for the language quickly. That doesn't mean you have to memorize it.
Edited: 2009-01-29, 11:49 am
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 548
Thanks:
0
Well, you also learn it so that you don't sound silly to educated people. Consider the apostrophe hell people without explicit training in English grammar get into.
~J
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 548
Thanks:
0
Could be a great deal worse; I'm primarily thinking of horror stories from native speakers. You do have some issues related to punctuation use and sentence flow (from the few posts I've looked at, I don't have time to analyze your entire posting history or anything). I wouldn't call it "bad", but you're not going to win any prizes for writing style.
~J
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,458
Thanks:
20
Punctuation use is purely a written-language phenomenon, of course, so in some ways it shouldn't be lumped in with 'grammar' in the linguistics sense. Everybody masters the grammar of their native language (wolf children and genetic disorders aside), but obviously not every native speaker masters the formal requirements (like punctuation and spelling) of the standard written form...