kazelee Wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy#RaceSo the silly boy kazalee tries to be a Clever Boy and looks at WikiPedia. But you seem to have missed the most common usage of the very common word boy
WikiPedia: Boy Wrote:An adult male human is a man, but when age is not a crucial factor, both terms can be interchangeable, e.g., 'boys and their toys' applies equally to adults and young boys, just as 'Are you mice or men?' can also apply to young boys.That's the way I - as in "me" - use the word BOY here and elsewhere: a not yet grown up male member of the homo sapiens animal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens
Once upon a time there was a very Famous Homo Sapien man, some say he was even more than a Man, and he said something like: "Father, forgive them 'cause they are really to bloody dumb to know what they are doing". And, boy, do you exemplify this extremely well? Yes, indeed.
First you post this link to the racist/fascist use of the word BOY and then you make yourself guilty of the most common MENTALITY and STRATEGY among racists and fascists: dehumanization!!! (*this individual* is a minor sin as in "removing the identity of a particularly disgusting enemy", very common by those fond of torture etc.: YOU DO NOT HAVE A NAME. NEITHER DO YOU HAVE AN IDENTITY. Mnemonics for Americans could be "Abu Ghraib" and "Guantanamo" and "History of Today".)
kazelee Wrote:Mr. Tobberoth, you are just going to get frustrated conversing with *this individual*. You cannot have a logical discussion with ***it***. *This individual* has already said ***it*** has received negative attention before, and the reason is more than clear, now. Rather than admit some sort of fault, ***it*** will continue down this path, and say whatever necessary to get a rise out of you. My sister behaves in much the same way. Attention, whether positive or negative, is attention. This is what ***it*** seeks.I doubt that you will follow any link I post here so I will quote a chunk - a very brief snippet - for you education from humiliationstudies.org (this particular text at http://tinyurl.com/a8jquj)
humiliationstudies.org Wrote:The term Dehumanization is exactly descriptive of that mental condition characterized as prejudice and usually referred to as fanaticism. And, in contrast to the common understanding of "dehumanization", it necessarily works bothEtc. etc.
ways: all that could possibly happen to our side because we are human, and that means vulnerable to mistake and sin and becoming evil in our war against them, is
swept forever under a Blind Area.
You can readily test my discovery against any conflict-oriented or prejudiced text anywhere. Allport provides a sample of demagogy on page 385 of The Nature of
Prejudice, that contains sentences like, "We have assembled under the banner of
Jesus Christ and the banner of our American Republic, the cross and the Flag, to
demonstrate to the international financiers of Wall Street, the international
Communists of Moscow and the international Jewish terrorists throughout the
world, that they have failed." - You will not find any evidence that the person is
aware that he and his followers might be wrong, might hate too much, or might
commit sins against their fellow Americans by being too extreme; or that their
enemies are individuals, each different and human, and many possessing good
qualities like themselves – basic self-evident facts of human reality.
Since everybody else are happy doing totally unfounded assumptions here, my guess is that you, kazalee, are around 14-15 years old and that your poor sister might be a couple of years older. I surely doesn't envy her having you as a little brother, a person so totally lacking any kind of self-reflective abilities. Send my best regards to her!
Edited: 2009-01-01, 4:04 am
