So I'll be finished with RTK1 in just a few days and will then be moving on to sentences but I've been playing around with a few ideas as of late on how we could really expand on the method and possibly combine the two main ideas of AJATT which of course is 10,000 sentences + constant immersion (usually via some form of audio).
What got me really thinking about this is the little Shadowing CD and booklet I have. I've been playing around with it from time to time when I'm not working on RTK1 and I came to realize just how little time it takes to acquire and understand a 30-40 second dialogue consisting of roughly 15-20 "sentences"...especially when you can read along with it at first.
I'd honestly say it only takes maybe 10-15 minutes or so before the entire dialogue starts to click and you understand just about everything in it. Basically my method is this:
1. Put the dialogue on repeat and just read along with it silently for the first 2-3 times. This is just to really make sure you know what is being said for any harder dialogue where you can't pick apart the sounds with just your ear.
2. Start shadowing while still reading along for the next 5-6 plays.
3. Put the book down and do the next 5-6 plays with just the audio only. While you're shadowing just really think of it as a conversation and try to imagine what is taking place.
As I said before that takes all of maybe 15 minutes or so and by then I've usually "got" the dialogue pretty damn well.
The kicker or course is that in that 15 minutes I just learned 20 sentences all in the context of real spoken dialogue while ALSO getting to exercise my own speaking ability. Throughout the day just pop in that same dialogue in maybe 10 minute spurts on repeat, alternating between shadowing and just pure listening and by the end of the day you got yourself and entire contextual spoken dialogue pretty well cemented in your head.
Now think about this. If you did only ONE such dialogue per day in one year you would have 7,300 spoken dialogue "sentences" that you would not only understand but could also speak. For those "hard core" among us that number could easily be doubled if not tripled.
So how could this be implemented with our SRS's such as Anki? Well we all know that plenty of people include audio for just their single sentences but for this method that would be a complete waste of time. My idea is that we would create entire MP3 play lists and/or CD's full of our dialogues and our Anki card "question" would simply be a note telling us which playlist/CD track. You also wouldn't need to have just one dialogue per track if you really wanted to. IMO you could easily have several dialogues per track because even a 60 sentence dialogue would only take up up a couple minutes at the most. Doing it this way in MP3 format you could easily have months worth of "cards" even on a single CD.
For example let's say you only do one dialogue per day. Maybe every three days you put those 3 dialogues together as "Track 1" in your MP3 play list. You then add an Anki card to your deck simply labeled "Listen to track 1" and maybe include the written text of the conversation as your "answer".
Any input or suggestions? When I finish up with RTK1 I believe I might give this method a shot and try to work out the details.
What got me really thinking about this is the little Shadowing CD and booklet I have. I've been playing around with it from time to time when I'm not working on RTK1 and I came to realize just how little time it takes to acquire and understand a 30-40 second dialogue consisting of roughly 15-20 "sentences"...especially when you can read along with it at first.
I'd honestly say it only takes maybe 10-15 minutes or so before the entire dialogue starts to click and you understand just about everything in it. Basically my method is this:
1. Put the dialogue on repeat and just read along with it silently for the first 2-3 times. This is just to really make sure you know what is being said for any harder dialogue where you can't pick apart the sounds with just your ear.
2. Start shadowing while still reading along for the next 5-6 plays.
3. Put the book down and do the next 5-6 plays with just the audio only. While you're shadowing just really think of it as a conversation and try to imagine what is taking place.
As I said before that takes all of maybe 15 minutes or so and by then I've usually "got" the dialogue pretty damn well.
The kicker or course is that in that 15 minutes I just learned 20 sentences all in the context of real spoken dialogue while ALSO getting to exercise my own speaking ability. Throughout the day just pop in that same dialogue in maybe 10 minute spurts on repeat, alternating between shadowing and just pure listening and by the end of the day you got yourself and entire contextual spoken dialogue pretty well cemented in your head.
Now think about this. If you did only ONE such dialogue per day in one year you would have 7,300 spoken dialogue "sentences" that you would not only understand but could also speak. For those "hard core" among us that number could easily be doubled if not tripled.
So how could this be implemented with our SRS's such as Anki? Well we all know that plenty of people include audio for just their single sentences but for this method that would be a complete waste of time. My idea is that we would create entire MP3 play lists and/or CD's full of our dialogues and our Anki card "question" would simply be a note telling us which playlist/CD track. You also wouldn't need to have just one dialogue per track if you really wanted to. IMO you could easily have several dialogues per track because even a 60 sentence dialogue would only take up up a couple minutes at the most. Doing it this way in MP3 format you could easily have months worth of "cards" even on a single CD.
For example let's say you only do one dialogue per day. Maybe every three days you put those 3 dialogues together as "Track 1" in your MP3 play list. You then add an Anki card to your deck simply labeled "Listen to track 1" and maybe include the written text of the conversation as your "answer".
Any input or suggestions? When I finish up with RTK1 I believe I might give this method a shot and try to work out the details.

