Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 96
Thanks:
0
Absolutely. It's like the "Whole Language" approach to reading (that was popular before the pendulum swung back to phonics). Kids learn to read by reading. And while reading they learn all the things that are left out of the language curriculum due to time, or just not fitting neatly into a lesson, etc., etc.,
Only difference is the sentence miners are pulling the sentences out of the whole language texts and using them as objects of study, so that they can access further texts...
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 236
Thanks:
0
Having thought about this for a while, I am beginning to think the same way. Chunks are probably a better division than words. That makes for much quicker sentence construction. Is learning through sentences the best way to learn the chunks? Also, will the chunks you are learning as you read a book like Kanji Odyssey be helpful when it comes to speaking? I have a feeling that the chunks used in speaking are much different than those used in formal writing. Like, I have never seen anything like 「いいかな」って思ちゃう感じ in writing, but this seems to be a pretty natural sounding spoken chunk.
Is there benefit in organizing lists of useful chunks? I would love to have a set of "speaking" chunks that I could practice from time to time, or have handy as I am chatting on Skype.
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,635
Thanks:
0
yukamina, sorry I could not understand what you meant with that.
Yo daniel, you solve that by having "casual" sentences in your deck.
Sentence mining is a great way of learning a language. It is fun to mine sentences from doramas, anime and songs. Songs are specially fun because they are very heavy on grammar (weird, but correct constructions).
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 244
Thanks:
0
[rant]
About phonics, my son Nicholas was having terrible trouble reading because they @#&%! tried to teach him to read just by showing him words and @#&%! expecting him to remember them. (Sorry for the bad language.) Maybe some kids can learn that way, but he wound up being unable to read a thing after twelve months of school.
So my wife bought a phonics reading program. We've ignored all the rubbish he gets home from school and concentrated on learning to read the old fashioned way, and thank goodness he's picking it up now.
The justification they give is that (a) most common words have irregular pronunciation and (b) adults read by sight. The flaw in that argument is that when you come across an unfamiliar word, what do you do? Sound it out! You only read it by sight once you've read it enough times to commit it to memory. Therefore the correct way to teach kids to read IMNSHO is phonetically. Just encourage them to memorize words they encounter repeatedly, and to teach irregular pronunciations as exceptions along the way. At least irregular words do provide a good hint as to how to say them.
[/rant]
Anyway, the question I was going to ask is that I've been using the SRS for a few months now, putting in Japanese phrases and sentences and checking my understanding. It's good, but have a problem with it.
What it does well is that my ability to read is improving, since after all that's what I'm exercising out. However, my ability to create sentences is lagging behind. In other words, it's putting heaps of words into my passive vocabulary, but not improving my active vocabulary much.
If it's a word that I revised the day or two before, say, I can use it in conversation. But if it's been weeks since the word last popped up, sure, I'll understand it if I read it somewhere, but I won't recall it in conversation.
Anyone else had this problem?
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 576
Thanks:
0
Yeah-you should make sure you test your self from English to Japanese.
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 96
Thanks:
0
Yukamina and Raichu
Don't get me wrong. I'm not down on phonics. Just the PENDULUM of fashion that says, "Now we shall teach all reading through phonics!" OR "Now we shall teach all reading through whole language study!" To my mind, we need both.
Individual sounds, single words, chunks, sentences, 4-5 line exchanges, discourse markers, etc are all important.
(Sorry Raichu, can't help with active vocab problem yet. I'm only at 385 kanji right now! I'll be asking your advice this time next year.)
Edited: 2008-08-30, 11:21 pm
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,635
Thanks:
0
Yo, I'm barely starting monolingual, but I already feel it is "the way". I feel like whatever I've done bilingual, I'll have to practice monolingual to have it working well.