Here's the Anki deck I was talking about:
Anki-Deck-RTK+RSH+RTH-v12.rar
Notes:
* There are 5800+ cards, many of them with no keywords and readings at all (Heisig's fault
) — filter for -is
uspended to have a quick look at some of the active simplified ones, where the © are those that I've added myself, manually (only a few);
* The model is configured for simplified characters, but it's easy to change;
* There seems to be some Heisig cards missing, which I'll have to look at later;
* I'm using a Kaiti font for the hanzi, size 7em — it looks great;
* Sound files are not included for now, but those of you interested can use any collection of mp3's named using the mandarin syllables (like this: wǔ.mp3, bā.mp3, yè.mp3, and so on), as there is a field called Hanzi Reading Audio which uses the respective code: [sound:{{{Hanzi Reading}}}.mp3].
Anki-Deck-RTK+RSH+RTH-v12.rar
Notes:
* There are 5800+ cards, many of them with no keywords and readings at all (Heisig's fault
) — filter for -is
uspended to have a quick look at some of the active simplified ones, where the © are those that I've added myself, manually (only a few);* The model is configured for simplified characters, but it's easy to change;
* There seems to be some Heisig cards missing, which I'll have to look at later;
* I'm using a Kaiti font for the hanzi, size 7em — it looks great;
* Sound files are not included for now, but those of you interested can use any collection of mp3's named using the mandarin syllables (like this: wǔ.mp3, bā.mp3, yè.mp3, and so on), as there is a field called Hanzi Reading Audio which uses the respective code: [sound:{{{Hanzi Reading}}}.mp3].
KanjiDevourer Wrote:But the keywords are the same incidentally; the hanzi/kanji have no relation whatsoever. Instead, the TH is also 澱 (or 淀) and the SH is 淀.This was something I was battling with: how to relate the characters. The main idea, IIRC, was to do it first by character and, if they were different, by keyword and, last, by meaning. There are exceptions, errors, and a lot of places where it can be improved though, so that's what we should do; it's an on-going project (slooow project, but... alive, I think).
Edited: 2011-09-01, 4:19 pm
