Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 116
Thanks:
4
I'm gonna take the same approach as Linguistics club at this point and just choose not to engage in this discussion any further. I've staked whatever flag I felt the need to stake, and you've certainly staked yours. Assuming Zgbangasdahsgd or whatever doesn't ban me, I don't really care about this thread in other exchanges. So just don't bring it up elsewhere, neither will I and we'll get along fine. I no longer have the energy for these pissing matches, but I'm only just learning how to just ignore them properly.
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,492
Thanks:
50
It saddens me when I am misunderstood in such a manner. English is not my first language, so perhaps I expressed it inadequately. Allow me to re-explain myself in hopes of making the forum guidelines understood.
Insults are not tolerated on this forum, though that being said bans are something that occur quite infrequently here. Luckily, warnings are usually a sufficient measure to take in case of escalation of aggression from certain users. Users are very rarely -if ever- banned, so one must be quite extreme to even get a threat of such a thing happening; I apologise if that is what you understood from my message; I was genuinely just giving you a warning to refrain from being insulting. Of course, opposing views are welcome on the forum so long as they are not condescending and insulting, and ad hominem free. If the reason for the warning was unclear, feel free to PM me regarding your post so as to not derail the topic further.
I am not sure in what discussion you are engaged in as since my entry into this thread you have simply acted condescending towards me, but of course, if something makes you feel uncomfortable then you are free to ignore it. I am unsure what flag I have staked, but I apologise if you have found it offensive.
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 784
CreepyAF Wrote:I was sitting in a coffee shop this morning, working on Anki. As I mentioned in another thread, lately I've been writing down most of my reviews on an actual pad of paper. I had it out when a girl (probably college aged) walked up to me and said, "You know Chinese?"
I smiled and said no, it's Japanese, and I'm no where near fluent. She asked if I was half Japanese, and I said no, I'm just interested in the culture, media, food, etc.
At this point she criticized me for "stealing Japanese culture", distorting it with my non-Japanese perspective and then propagating a diluted version of Japan to anyone I converse with, and not taking into account how a Japanese person would feel about me "idolizing" their culture. She said this behavior can even be considered racist.
I assume you're in North America. The problem is our school system. Left wing idiots long ago took over the education system and they teach kids that white people are evil mean racists. That foolish girl who implied you were racist is a product of this bastardized educational system.
Edited: 2015-09-30, 7:44 am
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 50
Thanks:
1
Ryuudou and Zgarbas just said all I was going to say (but I couldn't be bothered to engage claims, such as sholum's, in detai).
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,492
Thanks:
50
'someone called insulted because she over-generalised people of a group she disliked and denied my individual agency in the matter'
'That's because this girl is an idiot, like everyone in the group whom she belongs to, and she has no agency in making that decision'
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 223
Thanks:
0
Yeah, trying to picture a first time visitor to this site.
Hi everyone! I'm interested in Japanese, wanted to learn about studying kanji and...Holy crazap, what's going on here?
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 449
Thanks:
4
Zgarbas:
Just a suggestion, but I think it would be good if you clearly differentiated your speaking-as-a-moderator bits to your personal opinion bits. I'm pretty sure you're not, but it sounds a little bit like you're waving your power around on one particular side of the argument. Different coloured text or something?
Anyway, wow - I'm surprised that a forum about Japanese is so polarised and full of crazy. No one's even pretending they want to have a real discussion.
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,083
Thanks:
32
@Aikynaro Sure, it was asked of me before. I think by default moderators speak in person. And green / red text is used for moderation action.
Our moderation tools are very crude and it will be much better with MyBB soon anyway. There is a warning system with points, a reason can be given, a PM can be sent, and the list of warnings given can be reviewed by both admin, moderator, and the person in question. These warnings expire after given amount of days, weeks, etc. So by default you'll find moderators speaking in person, although the names will stand out in a different colour. But we will discuss the details when the new forum is up.
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,140
Thanks:
3
I feel like threads such as these belong on Reddit/Tumblr, not here. Sure it's the offtopic section, but man...
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 303
Thanks:
32
I really don't have enough interest in all this left/right thing to know what the various acronyms being tossed around even mean.
Just as an outsider, I would have thought that the notion of "cultural appropriation" in itself shows a supreme arrogance and an unspoken assumption that white Western culture is THE culture and therefore what it does with the bits of other cultures it assimilates (and all cultures other than isolated tribal ones assimilate bits of other cultures) is of huge importance to those other cultures.
The fact is, I would have thought, that just as most Americans neither know nor care how the Japanese are using bits of English, most Japanese people neither know nor care how (a few) Western people are using bits of Japanese. Why should they? The assumption that they do is founded on the assumption that white western culture is the pivot of the world.
Edited: 2015-09-30, 6:53 pm
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,492
Thanks:
50
It's not really about assimilation. Asian-American culture, for example, is quite common and a natural occurrence following the migration of Asians into the US. Cultural appropriation is more about having a simplified understanding of other cultures which leads people in a position of power to imitate aspects of other cultures, often in a manner which denigrates the importance of those aspects or helps perpetuate negative values. Of course, a lot of such actions are done voluntarily on the behalf of the other cultures themselves (Japanese people love to take you around Shinto shrines and teach you how to pray to them, for example), and usually the reaction from the locals is more amusement than actual offense, but it does carry certain implications that are part of a greater discourse.
For example, the appropriation of religious or important culture attire for fun (dreadlocks, Native American headdress) is generally considered cultural appropriation as it undermines the importance that they have in their original culture. Cultural appropriation of Japan is usually called out when people do sexy kimono modifications or dress up as geishas or mikos... though it should be mentioned that in Japan you can legitimately go to certain spots and do the geisha get-up, and mikos have lost their religious signification and are now just a plain job uniform. Of course, the fetishisation of such attire is yet another aspect...
It's not about actually liking Japan or learning Japanese or eating Japanese food, it's about being demeaning. And yes, usually it's white people doing it as white culture is the dominant one, and it has pushed its values onto other cultures; as such, appropriation is not done in a derogatory manner so much as because they are not the world's standard values, though of course there are exceptions. The Western cross as a fashion accessory would be a good example of cultural appropriation of Western culture. A lot of countries (including Japan!) also culturally appropriate the qipao and fetishise it.
The reason why Western discourse is usually the target of such analysis is that 1) you're a Westerner so it's the one you are likely to hear more about, 2) Western discourse is, at the moment, the world discourse, and its values have been actively and subconsciously integrated into world discourse, which has led to many of its standards becoming universal, 3) it is by far the most extensive. I didn't grow up with Romanian discourse, I grew up with Western shows and Western trains of thought and reading Western authors; the average Romanian will know far more about the US than about their own country. This goes for many countries around the world. South Americans will learn that their history began when they were colonised by Europeans, Romanians will learn that their history began when they were colonised by the Roman Empire, Japanese people will learn that anything pre-US interference is ancient history. When Western discourse has such a say in what matters to the entire world, it is inevitably the one to come under the spotlight.
Also, the English in Japan was a result of direct effort on the Western side. Japanese people did not just wake up one day and decide to start using it.