Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 449
Thanks:
4
Well, that's pretty creepy.
Are they required to do this, or just feeling really gung-ho about copyright all of a sudden?
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 116
Thanks:
4
My guess is somebody is putting the pressure on hard. But asking for our legal name is completely creepy. Still not sure what I should do.
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10
Thanks:
0
I'm a lurker here but just wanted to say that Damien is not a "profoundly stupid person" and that judging his intelligence on the basis of a decision such as this isn't very wise.
Nobody here knows what he was threatened with, for one, and even if the law is on his side (as far as the Core decks go), that does not mean he wants to spend who knows how much money and time defending himself in court from iKnow (and anyone else they can get together whose copyrights they can claim were or are being violated).
Anybody having to sign off on the decks they made from books and shared, especially, should appreciate the position he's in. Whether those are legal or not is arguable and as a result I bet almost everyone will hesitate before signing their name off on them.
My own guess, for what it's worth, is that Damien is being very prudent here. And my hope is that he uses this as an opportunity to raise Anki up to the next level, not give up on it.
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 116
Thanks:
4
I think it's pretty clear this is Cerego's doing unless we get information to the contrary. I've always supported iKnow financially for the great material, even when they did their morally grey stuff like the stuff they did when transitioning from Smart.fm. They won't get another cent from me at this point. Disgraceful.
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 99
Thanks:
3
Wow... This is really frustrating, even with Nayr's deck to fall back on. Does anyone know where I might be able to obtain the files for the Core 6000 then? I just wanna be able to keep up my study schedule with new vocab, and right now, I'm kind of worried that I might not able to do that.
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 126
Thanks:
0
Whoever's behind this, it's absolutely pathetic. People have used the materials for years believing they were free (as in freedom) to use, loading the guns with legal threats at this point is a moral offense. And forcing heroes like Damien into a corner with this pseudo-legal crap is an order of magnitude worse. Leave the language learners in peace. We have enough to worry about already, thank you very much.
I will keep spreading Core materials to whoever wants to use them, Cerego be damned. Corporate actions like these *really* piss me off. I'm very sad to see that it's already struck a blow to AnkiWeb.
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 563
Thanks:
4
A 3rd party resource for decks wouldn't be bad then.
Edited: 2015-03-03, 11:57 am
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,708
Thanks:
13
I think Damien should contact the EFF and consult with them. I know that Damien is in Japan so the hoops he'll have to jump through will likely be in Japan, but there may be some pro-bono EFF lawyers in Japan that might help him with this.
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 99
Thanks:
3
Kurikuri, you're absolutely amazing. You have no idea how much of a relief this is. I'll message you right now for the list.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 324
Thanks:
3
Just to make things clear: what is primarily under question here seems to be the possibility of sharing decks on the ankiweb site, in case the material they contain is subject to copyright.
Simply using the sync function privately on such existing decks to keep several devices synchronized is a distinct story, though copyright infringement may also be involved.
Is this also forbidden now according to Anki's new terms of contract?
If so, what are alternatives currently available to synchronize several devices (desktop - notebook - mobile phone) without relying on Ankiweb?
Could a new function be included in the Anki desktop program to make this synchronization more straightforward?
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 99
Thanks:
3
Even if that guy was hired just to write up the post according to what the company told him to, this still reeks of corporate arrogance. If they'd truly wanted to put their product out there, they would've competed, promoted it, and tried to make a mark on the Japanese learning community. While the quality of the Core decks is undeniable, they made them and then abandoned them. No effort was made at maintaining relevancy (as some of the cards will indicate), and furthermore, no effort was made at keeping iKnow's model attractive to potential customers.
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 812
Thanks:
13
That's a nice option, but given the lack of support for this in Anki Mobile, it's a nonstarter. If Damien adds support for custom sync servers to Anki Mobile, I'll gladly go this route and take some load off of AnkiWeb.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 324
Thanks:
3
Do I understand correctly that there is presently NO alternative to Anki Web syncing (including by making a physical connection between my iPhone and my Mac desktop)?
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 812
Thanks:
13
I already have an iPad, so I'll likely just drop down to local syncing. It adds some extra steps, but I really only need to sync when I add new content, so I'll probably just preload a bunch of content and export a collection package back and forth. This will likely be much faster than using AnkiWeb anyhow.
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 30
Thanks:
0
Crap, I have no computer skills so synching is out of the question. Hopefully they come to their senses.....
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 116
Thanks:
4
>7) Because of the issues raised in this thread, I can now see that turning a blind eye to copyright violations has been a mistake. We wanted to maintain a grey zone, but grey zones create complications and potential for misunderstanding. Going forward I will reach out to Anki and politely ask them to delist any content that contains Cerego copyrighted material. This shouldn’t impact anyone already using the content, but we do not want to be seen as encouraging the copyright violation of material licensed from elsewhere.
Wow. They had every opportunity to at least explain their position, and they couldn't help including brazen corporate arrogance. That post went from seeming reasonable and at least an attempt at genuine outreach, to pissing me off completely in one paragraph.
Nukemarine's response made me happy, he did a great job at communicating what I think we're all feeling.