Why do people feel the need to use GW Bush or Condolezza Rice in their stories? I understand that traumatic experiences and current events can be easier to remember for many members, but don't they see that their mnemonics are going to become obsolete within a year?
It's not about being respectful (I'm positive about mocking the leaders we have to suffer), but about the utility of those stories on the long term and its usefulness for other people. News and fads become old really quickly, and I think using those stories can backfire later.
I think changing those specific persons to more generic personalities (president of Freedonia, for example) would be better overall for all people, including those that don't want to see political issues during their free time.
This post can also be applied to stories including fads, rap stars, and latest movies.
It's not about being respectful (I'm positive about mocking the leaders we have to suffer), but about the utility of those stories on the long term and its usefulness for other people. News and fads become old really quickly, and I think using those stories can backfire later.
I think changing those specific persons to more generic personalities (president of Freedonia, for example) would be better overall for all people, including those that don't want to see political issues during their free time.
This post can also be applied to stories including fads, rap stars, and latest movies.
