Back

Question about complete immersion.

#1
I haven't officially started learning Japanese yet, because I'm still working on learning the kanji. But I had a question.

I used to think that you could learn to speak/understand Japanese through complete immersion and nothing else. Just watch Japanese TV, J-music, J-games, etc. I thought if you did it 24/7, you wouldn't need to actually study grammar/vocab/sentences.

People told me it wasn't possible. You needed to also study, because even though you're exposing yourself to the language 24/7, you wouldn't really learn much because you wouldn't understand what you were watching/listening to, and would have no way to actually learn what it meant.

But I've heard stories of non-English speakers who became fluent in English after a year or two, by doing nothing but watching English TV. They never actually studied English. If that's true, couldn't it also happen with Japanese? I know Japanese is different, but all languages are different from one another. And I'm not talking about the writing system. Just the actual language itself, such as speaking and understanding.
Reply
#2
Quote:But I've heard stories of non-English speakers who became fluent in English after a year or two, by doing nothing but watching English TV.
Most of the time when people claim that they did this, it turns out they actually didn't. What usually happens is that they study English in school, but they feel like that was useless, and then they watch TV (or whatever) and find that their proficiency improves a lot. So their conclusion is that the watching TV part was the only thing that did them any good. (Either that, or they did it when they were a young child and still within the critical period for language learning.)

I think it is possible that there exist people who have learned languages without studying. But recommending that people try this themselves is like saying that because some people learn to play instruments on their own, nobody should take lessons. Or because some children learn to read on their own, nobody should be taught to read.
Edited: 2013-12-10, 5:27 pm
Reply
#3
i don't know about you but i'd think it would take longer to learn the language if you withheld "studying" "looking up stuff" just so you have pure immersion. what do you think? i'm sure it's possible i just don't think it's efficient.
Reply
May 16 - 30 : Pretty Big Deal: Save 31% on all Premium Subscriptions! - Sign up here
JapanesePod101
#4
I can't see why you can't have both. I guess it wouldn't be pure, but since when has anything we do been pure? You could have an electronic dictionary with Japanese-Japanese, and if you can't get through that initial, just take a look at the English-Japanese or Japanese-English side. Sure, Japanese resources in Japanese are always better, but you have to somehow acquire the Japanese for them to be of any use.
Reply
#5
I have lived in Japan for 9 years... I deal with Japanese 24/7.

Nope, doesn't work. It gets you to a certain level, yes. I got to the point where I could do daily stuff because I had to. I learned more terms for education because that's what I work with... but I've developed more since I decided that this wasn't working and started doing the decks and studying, particularly with a language like Japanese that has multiple levels of politeness and a whole cultural aspect wrapped into it. I.e. I learned the hard way that terms I had picked up as a vol. firefighter were NOT appropriate to the school setting.

I'm not saying it cannot be done, because obviously it can be, but I would caution people in thinking that just coming over here or cocooning yourself in nothing put Japanese will work a miracle.
Reply
#6
I think listening to stuff you don't understand is a waste of time.
If those 24hrs/day are comprehensible, then ... sure? I think everyone agrees that extensive reading is a good thing and works wonders. The number generally given is 98% comprehension in order to be able to pick up new things without it being slow and frustrating.

So, if you can find a whole lot of material that you understand at that level and watch/read/listen to it continuously ... I'm sure it's possible.
It would be awful, of course. Glacially slow and intolerably awful.

Keep in mind how many words there are in a language. How many do you think you can pick up a day just by immersing? I imagine you can learn many times that in an hour of studying.

I think this thread has some lessons about the usefulness of immersion in stuff you don't understand.
Reply
#7
I recall reading about someone who attempted complete immersion in like Chinese by watching dramas all day. In the end, it seemed like there was only so much you can learn. I think you need a proper balance between deliberate study and immersion. Whatever that balance is, probably depends on the person.
Reply
#8
I'd say its a waste of time from the get go. If you have some experience with the language though and started putting 2 and 2 together, I can't see how it cannot help? Next year I'm going to start watching drama with both Japanese and English subtitles turned on at the same time.. And then gradually turn them off over repeated viewings Tongue Seeing both is so handy for me at first.
Reply
#9
It's possible but with one big precondition. It has to include bucket loads of reading to facilitate word learning (which is arguably study). The audio immersion pays off more and more as you know learn more words but is not a fantastic way to learn words at the outset.
Reply
#10
If you're interested in discussion I'd suggest looking up Stephen Krashen.

But if I was asked about it I'd personally suggest to at the very east use Anki or any SRS to do vocabulary.
Reply
#11
nadiatims Wrote:It's possible but with one big precondition. It has to include bucket loads of reading to facilitate word learning (which is arguably study). The audio immersion pays off more and more as you know learn more words but is not a fantastic way to learn words at the outset.
Agreed, just by watching Japanese Television it maybe hard to hear certain words. So it would be very helpful if you do lots of reading to enhance pronounciation, vocab, and etc.
Reply
#12
Well according to Krashen, one has to receive COMPREHENSIBLE input. If you watch Japanese shows without knowing anything about Japanese, then the input will be incomprehensible, which will not help you at all in learning a language.
Reply
#13
Thanks for the responses. I know I created this thread almost a month ago, but I had another question. Sorry for such a late reply.

In terms of just speaking/listening, can you learn Japanese through nothing but vocab words and immersion? Or do I need to study grammar/sentences, too? If I just did immersion, and learned new words all the time, would I be able to pick up grammar through context?
Reply
#14
Igloo9 Wrote:Thanks for the responses. I know I created this thread almost a month ago, but I had another question. Sorry for such a late reply.

In terms of just speaking/listening, can you learn Japanese through nothing but vocab words and immersion? Or do I need to study grammar/sentences, too? If I just did immersion, and learned new words all the time, would I be able to pick up grammar through context?
Never heard of anyone trying just immersion and vocab... but there's no question that it would be waaaay less efficient than if you just studied a modest amount of grammar. Japanese grammar is not very scary, to be honest, so I don't know why you wouldn't just study it a bit.

Also, in case your concern is learning the writing system, you don't really need to know the writing system to study grammar. There are textbooks that are basically entirely in romaji, and there are also textbooks where you can get by with just simple kana and no kanji.

But, the reality is that you're gonna hit a brick wall in learning the language if you never learn the writing system.

To give you an idea of how immersion works with no studying: People who live in Japan for even long amounts of time (five plus years) and don't study learn about 200 really common vocab words and never really learn to make sentences. Or, maybe 300 words if you count foods and restaurant words. Anyone who's lived in Japan knows these people, haha.
Edited: 2014-01-06, 3:43 am
Reply
#15
Igloo9 Wrote:In terms of just speaking/listening, can you learn Japanese through nothing but vocab words and immersion? Or do I need to study grammar/sentences, too? If I just did immersion, and learned new words all the time, would I be able to pick up grammar through context?
It sounds like a bad idea to me.
I think you can largely ignore formal study of grammar if you're learning your vocabulary through understanding sentences, but just vocabulary ... mmm. Well, it's probably doable - certainly more doable than trying to learn everything through immersion. But studying from sentences doesn't take all that much more effort than studying vocabulary in isolation, so you might as well do it that way.
Still - get the basics out of the way. Not even all the basics - but the really really basics, like kana, and what は, が, を, の, な, に, and で basically do. Something about verbs, maybe?

Immersion isn't some kind of magic though. At a beginner level I'd say immersion is worth pretty much nothing. Being surrounded by stuff you don't understand doesn't help.
Unless it's the kind of immersion where you have to constantly interact with Japanese people in their language to get by - but even living in Japan isn't a guarantee of that (I was one of those people Tzadeck talks about for an entire year...).

Also, picking up stuff just by listening is really hard. When reading it's pretty easy to pick up new words, but listening they just fly on by and you're on to the next thing before you have time to think about what it might mean given the context.
Edited: 2014-01-06, 4:52 am
Reply
#16
Aikynaro Wrote:(I was one of those people Tzadeck talks about for an entire year...).
Haha, don't worry, a year is pretty short actually. It takes a while to realize that you really aren't improving, and it also takes time to learn to study a language.

I had actually studied in classes for a couple of years before coming to Japan, but I really didn't improve fast my first year in Japan. I didn't know how to study on my own, and even if you have the basics down immersion is not so efficient without additional study.

Actually, I can really thank RTK for turning that around. Although Anki has proved of limited worth to me beyond it (since I really don't enjoy it), using SRS to go through RTK really got my learning going and taught me a lot about achieving difficult study tasks.

These days when I do study I spend a lot of time reading... which again, I think if I did stuff other than that I would improve faster (SRSing vocab...). But these days I have a girlfriend that speaks 0 English and a lot of friends who I can only communicate with via Japanese (not only Japanese people but also Taiwanese, Chinese, Korean, etc.), so at least I get a lot more speaking practice in. My goal in the next few months is to start doing more structured speaking practice. I bought a book for it, so maybe it'll happen, haha.
Reply
#17
Aikynaro Wrote:Still - get the basics out of the way. Not even all the basics - but the really really basics, like kana, and what は, が, を, の, な, に, and で basically do. Something about verbs, maybe?
http://amaterasu.tindabox.net/guide/
Reply
#18
I think you can learn Japanese through pure immersion, but you need to reach a certain level where you can understand enough Japanese to learn Japanese. That means being able to read Japanese definitions and stuff like that. Once you reach this level it probably becomes the most efficient path. Before you reach that level, it will hinder your progress and become less efficient because just looking something up in English, even though it breaks your immersion, will be a lot quicker in the long run. Unfortunately you're probably going to have to start with a grammar text book if you want to learn a language, as boring as that may sound, and you should expect to keep referencing them for quite a while. If you are doing 24/7 (no job, no school, just Japanese) it will still take you 3-4 months to get off of English completely, and if you are only doing around 2 hours of active studying (not passive) per day it will probably take you a year.
Edited: 2014-01-06, 5:40 am
Reply
#19
How exactly do I study grammar, though? Anki?

I've been using Anki for kanji, and it's been going well. I tried using it for grammar once, and it's hard and annoying. I'm not sure if I should memorize the sentence, or just learn the word in the sentence, while subconsciously remembering what the sentence sounds like without actually "memorizing" it. But that sounds annoying too.

Is there a good/fun way to learn some grammar? I'd rather not go all out and learn every bit of grammar in depth, because I'd rather pick up on it naturally. But since you guys are saying to learn some of it, I want to know what the best way is.
Edited: 2014-01-09, 11:43 pm
Reply
#20
Igloo9 Wrote:How exactly do I study grammar, though? Anki?
Well I study grammar solely on example sentences. Here's an example of me learning a grammar point through anki.

Grammar point being learned: ても
Example sentence: Igoloo9さんは日本語文法の本を買っても読みません
Really basic sentence, so pretty much on anki I have this sentence on the front. On the back is the furigana and a rough translation of the grammar point ても (although;even though). If I'm having trouble with the sentence I put a literal translation on the card too.

If that doesn't work, perhaps just keep reading things and hope to bump into the grammar points you're having trouble with a lot. Just keep searching it over and over again, it should stick. Anyway, good luck.
Edited: 2014-01-09, 11:57 pm
Reply
#21
Xanpakuto Wrote:Grammar point being learned: ても
Example sentence: Igoloo9さんは日本語文法の本を買っても読みません
Really basic sentence, so pretty much on anki I have this sentence on the front. On the back is the furigana and a rough translation of the grammar point ても (although;even though). If I'm having trouble with the sentence I put a literal translation on the card too.
Should I learn all kanji first, before even starting to study grammar?

Also, that's another thing I don't understand. If there's just a translation of ても, how would you know what the rest of the sentence says? You said there would be a literal translation if you were having trouble with it. At the beginning, wouldn't every card have a literal translation then?
Reply
#22
Igloo9 Wrote:
Xanpakuto Wrote:Grammar point being learned: ても
Example sentence: Igoloo9さんは日本語文法の本を買っても読みません
Really basic sentence, so pretty much on anki I have this sentence on the front. On the back is the furigana and a rough translation of the grammar point ても (although;even though). If I'm having trouble with the sentence I put a literal translation on the card too.
Should I learn all kanji first, before even starting to study grammar?

Also, that's another thing I don't understand. If there's just a translation of ても, how would you know what the rest of the sentence says? You said there would be a literal translation if you were having trouble with it. At the beginning, wouldn't every card have a literal translation then?
As for your first question, that's completely up to you. It depends on how much time you have throughout the day.

After you get a foundation on grammar, learning new grammar is rather easy, but there are some exceptions of course. But yes, when I was doing Genki 1/2 I put the whole translation in there. I also have a separate vocabulary deck where I put all the vocabulary I run into there (including example sentences)

Edit: Forgot that you're just about to start to learn some Japanese. I'd actually recommend learning maybe through a textbook just like Genki. Study the words and the sentences and you should be good to go. Or you can just take the RTK route and study some kanji for over 3 months or so, if that, taking no Japanese in whatsoever. OR, you can do both and study Japanese all day.
Edited: 2014-01-10, 12:33 am
Reply
#23
Igloo9 Wrote:Is there a good/fun way to learn some grammar? I'd rather not go all out and learn every bit of grammar in depth, because I'd rather pick up on it naturally.
The guide I linked above does pretty much just that. Read up on particles, analyze some native materials*, check the translation to see how well your analysis matches reality. Repeat process with the other sections of the guide.

*Just trying to figure out the example sentences using Rikaichan and Furigana Inserter (Firefox extensions. There's also Rikaikun for Chrome and Rikaisan for Opera) served me pretty well until part 3: clauses.

It can be mind-numbingly hard in the beginning, though.
Reply
#24
Igloo9 Wrote:I haven't officially started learning Japanese yet, because I'm still working on learning the kanji. But I had a question.

I used to think that you could learn to speak/understand Japanese through complete immersion and nothing else. Just watch Japanese TV, J-music, J-games, etc. I thought if you did it 24/7, you wouldn't need to actually study grammar/vocab/sentences.

People told me it wasn't possible. You needed to also study, because even though you're exposing yourself to the language 24/7, you wouldn't really learn much because you wouldn't understand what you were watching/listening to, and would have no way to actually learn what it meant.

But I've heard stories of non-English speakers who became fluent in English after a year or two, by doing nothing but watching English TV. They never actually studied English. If that's true, couldn't it also happen with Japanese? I know Japanese is different, but all languages are different from one another. And I'm not talking about the writing system. Just the actual language itself, such as speaking and understanding.
It all depends on what kind of immersion we are talking about. In fact, it all depends on how wide a category of activities we decide to call "immersion".

If we define as immersion any and all things that have a purpose other than simply to study the language, then I think it's not only possible to learn a language through immersion, but, past an initial period of formal study (the size of which varies depending on the difficulty of the language - for some, it could very well be minuscule, for Japanese, not so much), easier to do. The initial period of formal study is necessary (with the more difficult languages) because, while some types of immersion are possible without knowing anything, they're not very helpful types of immersion. In fact, I can only think of two: listening to music, and watching stuff with subtitles. I assure you, just doing that will make progress very slow when you know nothing.

However, past that initial period of study, the possibilities open up. The thread mentions extensive reading. There's also readers, or reading regular content with various helpful tools (ranging from a dictionary to fancy software that delivers definitions at the click of a mouse or touch of a finger). And then there's the best one of them all: written communication, with native speakers (with the help of a dictionary, spell checker, grammar checker, google, and any other tool at your disposal).

All these methods, and many more, fit my definition of immersion: they serve a purpose other than studying. You are reading things that interest you, talking about subjects you are interested in, etc. Because of this, they are not only useful, but it is my belief that they are a better method of learning a language than studying for the sake of studying.

P.S. There is one significant exception to the rule of needing at least some formal study: English. English is so widespread, and most people are exposed to such massive amounts of it (especially in countries that don't dub American media) that, as long as you have a curious mind, you're gonna learn it from scratch without any study. Not because the crappy flavors of immersion (listening to things one doesn't understand and watching with subtitles) work well, but because there's so much of it that it doesn't matter that progress is extremely slow. By the time someone reaches adulthood, they've spent a couple of decades listening to it. With formal study, they would've been fluent already, but even without it they're past a point where formal study is needed, and ready to learn by using the language.

Other languages can be that exception too, for the same reason, if one spends a long time in an environment where they're used a lot. But English is used that way almost everywhere.

JusenkyoGuide Wrote:I have lived in Japan for 9 years... I deal with Japanese 24/7.

Nope, doesn't work. It gets you to a certain level, yes. I got to the point where I could do daily stuff because I had to. I learned more terms for education because that's what I work with... but I've developed more since I decided that this wasn't working and started doing the decks and studying, particularly with a language like Japanese that has multiple levels of politeness and a whole cultural aspect wrapped into it. I.e. I learned the hard way that terms I had picked up as a vol. firefighter were NOT appropriate to the school setting.

I'm not saying it cannot be done, because obviously it can be, but I would caution people in thinking that just coming over here or cocooning yourself in nothing put Japanese will work a miracle.
Obviously, if you define "immersion" as "using a language in everyday life and nothing else", you aren't going to learn it to any kind of a deep degree of proficiency. That's simply because only a very small portion of a language is used in everyday life.

But "talking to volunteer firefighters" and "doing decks" are not the only options. You could also read. Or communicate with different kinds of people. Or write. You really don't need to spend your days doing Anki decks to become more proficient in a language you already speak.

As someone who has learned several languages past the point of "everyday use", I'm telling you: there are better ways to learn than studying.
Edited: 2014-01-10, 3:40 pm
Reply
#25
Vempele Wrote:
Aikynaro Wrote:Still - get the basics out of the way. Not even all the basics - but the really really basics, like kana, and what は, が, を, の, な, に, and で basically do. Something about verbs, maybe?
http://amaterasu.tindabox.net/guide/
Tried your link, but got 404 Not found. Do you know what happened to the page? Moved somewhere else, etc.? I already heard about Ixrec guide before so I would like to check it.
Reply