Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
Thanks:
0
Hello everyone =).
After doing some research and getting some awesome replies on my Core 2k/6k/10k thread, I came to the conclusion that for someone who's aiming at full proficiency or even at passing N1 eventually, the Core material won't be enough.
So, would you guys recommend any sentence decks that cover N2 and N1 with images and all the nice stuff that Core decks usually have?
Thank you in advance again.
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 449
Thanks:
4
You could try subs2srs. I don't know that there are any big, public, premade subs2srs decks around though, so you'd probably have to roll your own.
It does take some effort to get your cards set up, but you get audio and images. Plus it's native material, which is nice (I've discovered that the apparently dreaded 'とことん' appears three times in my deck of 4694 cards).
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
Thanks:
0
I'll try these out =).
Thank you so much guys!
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 703
Thanks:
7
After core10k, you will need to stop adding things to anki, and focus on reading (a lot) in order to close the gap to N1.
speaking as someone who has taken the test... you need a high reading speed, and a comfort with MANY frequently used idioms/turns of phrase that would be super inefficient to anki.
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 703
Thanks:
7
my point is just that a post-core10k anki deck is kind of missing the point.
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
Thanks:
0
I do understand that by only studying the decks, it's possible I won't be fully prepared to take N1. But I'm frequently consuming all kinds of japanese media, which makes me believe I won't have big issues with the test if I review everything thoroughly.
Thank you for all the replies =)!
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 428
Thanks:
5
Shuugo I think you are still missing the point so I'll summarize them.
1) You need a solid vocabulary (10k+), kanji (2k+) and grammar foundation.
2) You need to be able to apply that foundation to native level reading and speaking situations with a high degree of speed and accuracy.
3) You will need some N1/JLPT specific test taking skills and strategies.
You're original post asked, "I already have done tons of #1 should I do more #1?" The answer is no, you'll need to do a massive amount of #2 and also a small amount of #3. Furthermore your post above sounds like you were going to ignore the fact that N1 is somewhat focused on scholarly articles and not "Japanese media". Mass media, regardless of the language, is often closer to middle school level so that it is easily and quickly understood by everyone.
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 464
Thanks:
0
In the case of Japanese I actually prefer the high comprehension approach because looking words up is necessary for three reasons: I forgot the meaning, reading, or both. This is double the amount of interruptions compared to roman alphabet languages. Obviously reading issues will diminish over time but exceptions are still abundant and new kanjis keep being introduced.
My point is that at least for me, until I move away from knowing readings on a per word basis to a per kanji basis I feel that there is much more value for me in taking the time to learn the words I come across because each word has two components for me to learn. It's more taxing to do on the fly than with any other language.
I notice this when I come across names. The readings just don't come to me effortlessly even though I may know many words with the kanjis in them.
It's hard to explain in all honesty. It just feels like learning in anki continues to benefit me because I am learning and reinforcing two kinds of information.
Edited: 2013-12-16, 1:32 pm
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 703
Thanks:
7
you're gonna have to take the training wheels off eventually. It's never going to feel easy when you do either, no matter how much one furiously anki's in preparation.
Edited: 2013-12-16, 6:52 pm
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 464
Thanks:
0
Yes you can also dive in without using training wheels at all.
But when it comes down to what is the most efficient way to do something I'm not buying that 6-10k argument (esp. 6k) which I agree should be true for other languages.
As long as the word includes kanji one is still unfamiliar with reading-wise or has an uncommon reading I see significant value in adding it to Anki, surpassing the value of SRS'ing roman language vocab for example.