Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,944
Thanks:
11
This discussion has been done before. The policy has been inconsistent in the past but the current policy seems to be to leave all stories up, no matter how offensive they are or even if they have incorrect primitives or information.
There are stories on the site that are far more inappropriate than that one.
Edited: 2013-09-02, 9:34 am
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 298
Thanks:
0
Besides that one also has 300+ stars, sounds like its a pretty good one to me!
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 564
Thanks:
1
I tried to be so elitist as to only use stories that are beaming emblems of the beauty of human creativity and verbal poetry. But the dirty stories sometimes just work better.
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 126
Thanks:
0
Let's not forget what inappropriate actually means.
ap·pro·pri·ate 1. suitable or fitting for a particular purpose, person, occasion, etc.: an appropriate example; an appropriate dress.
Inappropriate for whom? Many of those stories work for the site's audience and are appreciated by the community. So I'd say they are actually very appropriate. Stories containing sexual or violent elements are not automatically bad or unwanted, which 'inappropriate' seems to imply. They may not be appropriate to a specific person, but the same goes for stories about, say, religion. Personally I don't care in the slightest as long as it's memorable, and stories that disgust or shock people actually tend to be remembered better since they have (strong) emotions attached to them. I think Heisig even states this explicitly.
Of course a threshold setting (anyone can choose to hide stores with x+ reports and /or x- stars) wouldn't hurt in the slightest. Just a matter of whether the admin feels like implementing it.
Edited: 2013-09-02, 1:22 pm
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2
Thanks:
0
Seriously? What's up with all the puritans on this site? Anytime someone's story is even remotely sexual it automatically generates a zillion red flags. These are mnemonics for learning kanji, not interpretations of biblical script. Get your panties out of a bunch and take your morality elsewhere.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,944
Thanks:
11
Last time we had a discussion about that magnet story, it brought a bunch of single-digit-post-count people out to cry about fascism, book-burning, etc. (And now we have someone who created an account just to bump a 4 month old thread.)
I agree with gaiaslaugh; I would like to see two types of stories removed -- ones that have wrong information (e.g. wrong primitives, etc.) and stories that are offensive towards particular groups. But it's not my site and I don't really use it anyway, so I don't push the issue. I don't think the admins are really interested in policing the stories.
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 258
Thanks:
3
If a story shocks, offends, sickens, arouses, or otherwise bothers me in any way, that's the story I'll pick, without hesitation, every time. Picture a boy standing on a cliff looking at the writhing shape of his fallen, dying beloved below? ***** hell, that's awful, I'll use it!
Bland stories are easily forgotten, but if something offends you it'll stick around. Use this to your advantage.
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 762
Thanks:
3
I would say that this is one of those cases where the end justifies the means.
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 61
Thanks:
0
I, personally, don't think 'inappropriate' stories should be removed (with the exception of those with incorrect primitives or reprehensible content [i.e. that magnet story]). I also agree however, that having inappropriate stories on full display makes the community look bad.
Why not have a story become hidden after a certain number of flags and then give users the option to toggle 'mature content' on/off as a preference? That way if we actively want to see those stories (as I, admittedly, did when I was going through RTK) we can set them to appear.
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 159
Thanks:
3
Maybe just default to a forum "spoiler"-behavior sort of thing for any stories which surpass a certain report threshold (i.e. default to having them hidden, but allow a user to reveal - a little like reddit comments?). Allow this setting to be enabled/disabled via user settings. This seems to be somewhat of a reasonable compromise.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,944
Thanks:
11
That would be the judgment of the administrator; it's not as impossible an issue as you seem to think.