yudantaiteki Wrote:But a lot of what people are calling "censorship" is just being polite, and I still think there's a lot of inconsistency in this idea of "self censorship". Once again, if it's not OK to say something to someone's face, I don't see why it's OK to put it out anonymously on the Internet where they can see it.Well, for one, insulting someone is entirely a different issue, and I think that's bad for the forum. Mentioning the word 'bitch,' using the word 'bitch,' and calling someone a 'bitch' are three different things. (Though, I've insulted people on this forum in clean language, and that's usually considered okay, but in my mind there's no real difference between doing it in clean or dirty language. I was just getting away with something that I shouldn't have. Stansfield was completely right when he said I insulted him in this very thread.)
Should the board also operate in this way, with no rules against any kind of posts whatsoever?
I think there's also something to what buonaparte said about impersonal things being less rude. If I'm in a social situation with a group of people, my actions have a meaning in that social situation and I have some responsibility. For example, if I'm making jokes about blowjobs, or something like that, it is interpreted very differently depending on the situation. If I'm around a group of guys that like dirty jokes and my jokes are good, it'll just be interpreted as me being funny and nothing beyond that. But if I did it around a group of women that I didn't know that well they might interpret it very strangely indeed. (Not to be sexist--of course there are women that can appreciate a good blowjob joke).
But when you're just posting a lot of stories with no particular social situation I'm not sure how much responsibility you have. I think that group of girls in the blowjob joke situation might feel a bit scared, but there's no reason for someone to feel scared from their computer chair.
You're right in a way though, that another perspective to look at it from is politeness, and in a way the two points of view are hard to mesh together. And I do think that stories can be legitimately inappropriate, but they're not the ones that simply talk about sex or use bad language--there's nothing harmful about either of those things. Another thing is that a site is like a business, and you may need to think about which policy would be best for getting the most users--I understand that.
I know my thoughts are pretty here-and-there on this issue. I'm not upset about what Fabrice is doing; it's a reasonable way to do it, but I wouldn't do it myself. In a way it's because society overwhelmingly takes a point of view similar to yours on this issue, and I think it's more complicated than that, so if I had a website I would take the less popular stance.
Edited: 2015-01-24, 11:10 pm
