Joined: May 2012
Posts: 812
Thanks:
13
N2. I owned kanji and vocab. Grammar wasn't too bad; the grammar reading was easy.
Reading - my huge weak spot last year; I didn't even finish, and failed the section. I finished this year, and am a lot more confident in my answers. I answered the last five in a rush, but feel I did well enough early on to compensate.
Listening killed me. I didn't study this explicitly
Because I managed to pass the section last year. I may have failed the section, and this the test.
We will see. I won't be devastated if I don't pass. I've learned a TON in the past year, and this test proved that.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 73
Thanks:
0
Answers to the test are available at the usual Chinese website(s) now. That's for those of you who managed to jot down or remember what you answered for each question. Just a heads up though, some of the answers given are conflicting so it's a bit of a mixed bag.
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 52
Thanks:
0
Hi. I know most of you are at N2 or N1 level, but I wanted to post anyway, in case there are any other beginners like me out there reading this.
I've been studying on my own for ages with a zillion resources, but with no tests, accountability, structure or pressure. And thus no focus or direction - and really getting nowhere - just repeating the same few grammatical constructions with each new exciting website or book I discover, and never finishing any of them. Decided to register for N5 just to see if I've managed to actually learn anything along the way...
I could answer about half the sample questions on the JLPT site at the N4 level, but I soon realised there's a whole lot of basic N5 grammar I didn't know. And having done RTK, I was shocked to have to go back to reading almost everything at N5 level in kana. With the vocab I didn't know, it was just a jumble of meaningless hiragana - no helpful kanji picture to help me figure it out!
I took a mock exam a few weeks ago, and then found out about sample question practice books, so have been working through them and learned heaps. Heading into the exam, I was feeling pretty good about it.
There are 3 sections in N5: Vocab (25 mins), Reading (50 mins), and Listening (30 mins). In my practice tests and the actual exam yesterday, I think I got close to 100% for vocab/kanji/kana. I finished it in half the time and was able to check everything.
The first part of the grammar was much harder than I anticipated. Had to just keep saying to myself, "Make a decision and move on," since I was afraid of running out of time for the reading comprehension. But the latter turned out to be really easy. So I had time to go back over the grammar, but didn't have a clue about some of it, even though I really thought I'd covered everything in my preparation... Oh well, there's still that 1 in 4 chance of fluking some correct answers!
The listening wasn't as difficult as some of the practice tests I did. But my concentration - always my biggest problem - was such that I just completely missed the question a few times, so I didn't know what to be listening for... Mostly, it wasn't too bad, though.
I'm glad it's over - I've really missed kanji! But going for the test, even at that level, was definitely a good decision that really focused my learning.
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,140
Thanks:
3
Took N1 in Chicago.
-Grammar was aight.
-Reading was horrible.
-Listening I probably failed.
Overall I don't expect much.
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 564
Thanks:
1
Felt like Memento, haha, that was me last year, Zgarbas. This year (N3, N4 last year) I did okay I think on listening and the vocab was a piece of cake. But grammar section those star questions threw me off. I didn't have enough time for the last 6 questions of that section and it's because of those star questions, but if I had time I'd be fine, especially the last two Q's where you look at some schedule thing and figure out this and that; that's just scanning.
edit: even if I don't pass I'm going for N2 next year.
Edited: 2013-12-01, 10:34 pm
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 361
Thanks:
0
N2 - NY. Man I hope some miracle happens and I pass overall. I didn't do to well in listening and had to skip one section of the reading and only skim 2 sections. Vocab and and all those little drills whatever you want to call them I feel i rocked though. except for 寄付 i think i chose 寄符。 I didn't even know what the word was suppose to mean so that didn't help
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 801
Thanks:
0
Keep checking once or twice a day. Usually they have them up within a few days after the test, if not the day after.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Thanks:
0
N5 in Houston. After years of on and off self-study, I figured this year I'd finally take the JLPT to see what I had accomplished. Earlier in the year I had been thinking of trying for the N4, but after getting sidetracked from my studies for about 3 months I was off pace and registered for the N5 instead.
It started off great, no doubt about doing fine on the vocab. Then came the grammar/reading. A few questions I wasn't confident in my answers on, but overall quite satisfied. Finally the listening. I had worried about this, since my study methods don't focus on the skill, but after doing okay on a mock test I had been feeling good going into the test. Afterward though, not so much. My brain was able to understand the words, but in slow motion. By the time the meaning of the question came together, most of the info for answering it had already gone by. This happened on a disturbing number of questions, so my overall sense is that I have the overall points to pass, but may have bombed the listening. Time will tell.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 73
Thanks:
0
One thing I've noticed with reading is that the JLPT almost never tests language that is used mainly in fiction (i.e. light novels, novels, literature etc). You just don't see the kind of words (especially descriptive ones) that you see in novels. It's all non-fiction -- essays, articles, letters, brochures. Things that are certainly useful in everyday life, but not necessarily even close to what the full language encompasses. I guess in that sense it's no different from not testing specialised articles on politics, economics or scientific topics. Testing the ability to read literature probably isn't one of the aims of the test.
But hey, I'm not complaining. I'm really weak when it comes to the often flowery/descriptive language used in fiction, and I'm a lot more confident when it comes to real-world stuff like newspaper articles and essays. I just thought it was an interesting observation.
Edited: 2013-12-02, 12:39 am
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 42
Thanks:
0
Took the N1 in Vancouver.
Felt a bit worse than when I took N2 last year, but I think it's a pass.
I didn't know what とことん means... damn it.
Also, somehow I'm really bad at the part of the listening section where you have to choose an appropriate reply... I just kept missing what's going on in the situation. Thankfully it's 1 out of 3 choices so hopefully it won't be too bad.
Edited: 2013-12-02, 1:14 am
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8
Thanks:
0
I took N2 for the first time yesterday. I'm pretty sure I failed. There were some kanji/vocab I didn't know, and don't get me started on 読解. Listening was mostly cake (I've got to feel good about something!), but I live in Japan and have a Japanese significant other, so I'm constantly bombarded by it.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,879
Thanks:
19
Thanks Fillanzea! I think that'll help a lot. I am interested in current events, but I have to admit my eyes glaze over a bit when it comes to the Japanese Parliament and all of its various machinations. (It may just be that I don't like listening to Japanese politicians on TV.) But the other stuff sounds really interesting.