Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 67
Thanks:
0
How much care do you give to the study of the exceptions?
I'm not sure if it's worth moving them to the back of the cards...
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 854
Thanks:
31
Memorize their readings with separate cards.
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 67
Thanks:
0
I have a question about the exceptions notation used in the deck.
For example, does "-匋:tou" indicate that every kanji with the 匋 component is read "tou" as well?
Whereas "-谷" simply points out that the 谷 kanji has different (or non unique) readings...
Have I got it right?
Edited: 2013-09-16, 5:53 pm
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 240
Thanks:
0
The reasons I used for not including a reading are as follow:
1. It's a component already included in another card (you study the reading separately).
2. It's an extremely irregular component with many readings (only useful to mark an exception to the general rule), or
3. It's a single-kanji exception (no advantage in learning the reading this way).
Technically, for the exceptions that include a reading, you could insert a new card in the deck to study it separately.
Feedback is welcome. :-)
Edited: 2013-09-19, 4:19 pm
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 28
Thanks:
0
Bumping it too. This seems a pretty interesting study. Good work in finding and filtering all those phonetic components.
As for the anki deck, it would be good to have extra fields with examples where it works (not only exceptions), purity and number of characters covered. The ordering of the deck seems suboptimal, but w/o those last two fields I can't fix it.
I'm starting to add examples manually... but it is quite laborious... I also moved the exceptions to the back of the card.
EDIT: now that I saw that some cards have examples in their mnemonic field. But only a few of them, usually when the component has more than one reading.
Edited: 2015-11-09, 1:29 pm