Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 609
Thanks:
5
Those cards do look much better than the old ones!
At work at the moment so no access to Anki. I was using the "Sheet3 Deck [cloze version]" (about 300 cards in) has this one been updated with the fancy formatting?
From the sound of it there are new fields? I'll have a try at importing this new deck into the old one this evening.
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 180
Thanks:
1
Oh ma lawd, suppose I'll have to click easy for the cards I've already been reviewing on the old deck, looks a lot better.
How long did it take to write up the first dictionary? Must've been a fair bit of work. It's surprising how much people are willing to help others in a shared field of interest. I wonder if English has as large an online community-based resource pool as Japanese lol
Edit: post details no longer relevant; post deleted.
Edit: post details no longer relevant; post deleted.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,313
Thanks:
22
First, this is an amazing amount of effort and an amazing product.
I'm wondering about your beginner friendly re-order. Do you have an index or can you add an index to the spreadsheet that lists the beginner new order. My think is the order index should be on a per section basis and not per sentence. So the three あげる(1) sentences with 63 on the page index would have re-order index of 15 (made up by me). あげる(2) sentences with 65 on the page index would be re-order index of 36.
Also, what did you use to determine the beginner friendly re-order. At one time, I was going to use either Tai Kim or maybe even the Kanzen Master since they seemed better as a learning order than the dictionary order of the books.
Edit: post details no longer relevant; post deleted.
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 27
Thanks:
0
Uisukii and Tamba...you are amazing. Thank you so much <3
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3
Thanks:
0
This looks awesome! I'm going to start it today.
I'd just like to point out a spelling error in cards B0087 through B0091.
"A particle which indicates location, expect for the location of existence."
I suspect "expect" was meant to be except.
Thanks for all the hard work you put into this deck!
Edit: post details no longer relevant; post deleted.
Edit: post details no longer relevant; post deleted.
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 95
Thanks:
0
First and foremost, thanks for all the work you've done!
The updated deck for both basic and intermediate grammar books looks like this:
Front: 522
Back: 'b.コンサート[...]八時から[.../(polite)]。'
From both ankiweb and mediafire. Card template is front: expression, back:meaning, so I guess it's the default one when you create new decks. Was it supposed to be like this?
Just noticed that all the fields besides Expression, Meaning and Reading arent there.
Edited: 2013-06-21, 6:15 am
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 120
Thanks:
0
Webmaster, the material posted in this thread is copyrighted.
It is still effectively accessible via the "website" link on my profile, for the decks, and the Google spreadsheet isn't going anywhere- an email my way and I'd be able to send them a link (it's "shared", so no one needs to sign in or anything to see/download it). But yeah, shame on me for sharing this information, I guess.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,313
Thanks:
22
There's kind of a gentleman's agreement on the forum about items that are crowd sourced from copyrighted material. Spreadsheets from 2001.Kanji.Odyssey, Dirty Japanese, Understanding Basic Japanese Grammar, etc. are locked down and given viewing access by the owner of the spreadsheet to those that offer modest proof of ownership such as a photo of the book with their email address in the picture.
I think its been an ok way to go. Seven or so years ago there was a copyright complaint on this forum from the guy that put together the Spanish version of RTK. He moaned about people figuring out how to get the info from the official computer version of RTK claiming doing so violated copyright. Fabrice shut down the thread. Aside from that, there's been little to no copyright complaints. I would hope that's been in part is that we don't blatantly trade info gleamed from books. We skirt the line and sometimes jump across it but for the most part we're interested in the academic aspect of everything.
Now, if you lock down your spreadsheet and offer viewing rights to those that have proof of ownership, you're going to get a lot of requests to access it. That does get tedious. Even then, the owners could pitch a fit to Google thinking they own every method of transmission of their material even if you bought their book once. You also have guys that think its fine and dandy to share anything and everything once it's been translated to electronic media. I think somewhere between those extremes is a rational medium.