Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 180
Thanks:
1
I downloaded the ones on the Japanese shared deck page @ ankiweb.
Core 2000 is divided into 10 "steps" (individual decks), and Core 6000 has 12. There's just under 30,000 cards between them, but I've noticed they create three cards per sentence: one for Listening, one Reading and one for Production, so there's probably less than 10,000 unique sentences in total.
30,000 cards sounds like something that will take 2 years on non-stop work to complete. As much as I want to move forward, are there other things that need equal consideration? Grammar for example (it's the only other thing I'm aware of).
I'm fixed on going to Japan between August 2014 - August 2015 and I reaally want to cover as much ground as I can in terms of a) listening comprehension and b) speaking ability. I have 17 months to work with.
I've recently re-downloaded a core deck for Anki2, and it is the "Core 2K/6K Optimized Japanese Vocabulary" deck, with a close where the appropriate vocab term should be. I'm pretty sure it is the one which Nukemarine did up (the order is pretty sweet in that you aren't thrown a shittonne of unknown terms while trying to memorise the actual vocab word). This deck has 5999 cards.
I've no idea where 10,000 is coming from, but unless there are double entries or something, it doesn't really sounds like you've got the core deck.
If you want the one I'm using, I could email it to you (if you can't find it in the shared deck page). To be honest, whatever deck you're using sounds like overkill. Core is useful in that it covers terms you're going to see everywhere, and the example sentences use basic grammar (if grammar is an issue).
If I were in your position (which I'm not, so take this as a grain of salt), I would use the deck I'm using, or a similar one (which covers the basic 6000 words), and get through it as soon as possible (if the grammar isn't an issue) and keep up with the reviews.
To be honest, it does take a fair while for Japanese grammar -as logical/simplistic- as it is (in that there is a certain predictability and accessibility which, for example, English doesn't really allow for the basic "level") will take time and exposure to start to "feel normal". BUT, you'd be surprised how little it takes for your pattern recognition ability to be rendered all but useless by the sheer volume of the pool of words even the more "basic/simple" native reading material draws from.
Something basic and easy to get through like core can pay dividends down the track when you're trying to read more advanced grammatical examples and you don't have to worry too much about encountering unknown terms. Okay, some find it boring, but even so it isn't something you're going to be trying to initially encounter and learn for all that long. 50 words a day isn't really that much, as long as you don't stuff around with the reviews. For example, even if you fail 20 cards, 20 times in the same review session, if you only give yourself a few seconds before either knowing or not knowing the word, the overall review time, even with hundreds of cards, won't take more than a few hours, if that, and even that is an extreme example.
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 180
Thanks:
1
I see, well I downloaded the 5999-card deck but I don't hear any audio in the first 2000 cards. There's audio in the rest. Is this a problem on my end or with the deck itself?
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 324
Thanks:
3
Is there a simple way in Anki 2 to switch to one of those "optimized" core decks while retaining reviewing records from my standard Core 2K, which I have been studying for a long time already?
I would not like to start everything again from scratch…
Edited: 2013-03-13, 3:50 pm
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 180
Thanks:
1
It works! Mucho gracias, uisukii.
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 481
Thanks:
0
Use the Core 6000 based decks based off of Smart.fm/iKnow! first since the audio is at a more natural speed and they probably include the part of speech as well. Then do the ~3600 additional words in the Core 10000 deck if you want more (and you are not sick of it by then :>).