I have been reviewing with anki for about 1.5 years now and my daily due cards range from 40 to 70. Since I wanted to go under 40 cards per day, I decided to:
-Select a list of the 500 most failed kanji (this can be done, by using the anki's sorting function) and export it to a text file.
-Select from this list the first 100 kanji.
-Read this list every day for about one week (or more if you like) until this group of kanji become second nature to you (review also their story).
-Take another set of 100 kanji from the list of most failed kanji.
-Repeat the procedure.
-When you have finished them all, review the complete list every now and then (for example every month).
The most failed kanji should become the kanji you know better in about 1-2 months.
I am about finishing my first 100 kanji and I have to say that they are really "sticking" now. The kanji I failed most was 稜 (I do not know why).
I think it is useful to exploit the statistics that anki kindly generated and tracked for you. Of course you can use this method after at least one year of reviewing.
What do you think?
Have you tried something similar?
-Select a list of the 500 most failed kanji (this can be done, by using the anki's sorting function) and export it to a text file.
-Select from this list the first 100 kanji.
-Read this list every day for about one week (or more if you like) until this group of kanji become second nature to you (review also their story).
-Take another set of 100 kanji from the list of most failed kanji.
-Repeat the procedure.
-When you have finished them all, review the complete list every now and then (for example every month).
The most failed kanji should become the kanji you know better in about 1-2 months.
I am about finishing my first 100 kanji and I have to say that they are really "sticking" now. The kanji I failed most was 稜 (I do not know why).
I think it is useful to exploit the statistics that anki kindly generated and tracked for you. Of course you can use this method after at least one year of reviewing.
What do you think?
Have you tried something similar?
Edited: 2013-02-09, 6:35 am



