読解を成功にしているのに、少数の　文法が　分からない　点　が　あって 投稿しています。

。。。「どこか　に　行けば　この　本　が　手にはいる　の　か」。。。
上記の文に　"行けば"　の　英語通訳は　"If can go"って　である。　なぜ　行ったら　(just the "if" construction, rather than "ability" combined with "if")　だけ　が　つかいませんでしたか。
それに、　なぜ　自動詞の　「はいる」　が　使用して　変わりに　他動詞　の　「いれる」が　使用しませんでしたか。　

次の文：
それに　取り上げた　本の　著者に　「あの野郎、　ろくでもないこと　聞きやがって」　と　個人的に　恨まれたり　すること　も　ない　です　し　ね。

I have following questions about this sentence:
The meaning and usage of 取り上げる,
difference between 件 and こと,
meaning and usage of やがる (never seen in written work before),
and most importantly the method to interpret ~たり combined with ~し in the same sentence.

Thanks for your help, I just don't seem to be able to work out these things.

Edit: Actually I am asking this since I am confused. I am an Electronic Engineer with a strong background in Mathematics as well (have taught it) and Japanese is my 5th language. Asking questions is something I like to do very much.

Is this from READ REAL JAPANESE (Nonfiction)? This sentence is explained in there. し is for conversational emphasis. And the たり construction can be used with just one item to indicate "things like..."

Not sure why 取り上げた本の著者 is confusing? 取り上げた本の著者 -> The picked-up book's author. "Also, there wouldn't be occasion for the author of whatever book I picked up to get personally offended or anything, thinking, 'That trash-talking bastard!'"

matrixofdynamism Wrote:。。。「どこか　に　行けば　この　本　が　はいる　の　か」。。。

You added か and missed 手に:
「どこに　行けば　この　本が　手に　はいるのか」
Gloss: "If you go where, this book is available, explain?"
Translation: "Could you tell me where this book is available?"

Usually you tend to avoid asking questions "why" when it comes to language - sometimes you just need to accept the things the way they are.