I have a feature suggestion, or if someone knows how to do this, I'd love to know how: what I want is a way to set disambiguation so it would generate separate entries for each numbered definition E2A finds in the first dictionary it gets a hit in. (So if it was EDICT, it would just use EDICT's definition, but if it was Kenkyusha, it would go down each numbered definition in the Kenkyusha entry.)
So for example;
Foo: bar, barrr, barrrx
Would yield only 1 entry, but:
Foo: 1. bar
2. Barrr
3. barrrx
Would yield 3 entries, with the definition field set separately (and the example sentence set separately as well). If there's no example sentence, the definition stays, but the ExSentence field is blank, or flagged somehow.
That might be faster than disambiguating a bunch of entries, or at least it would be a way to make sure you can cover the definitions of some of the more definition-heavy verbs.
So for example;
Foo: bar, barrr, barrrx
Would yield only 1 entry, but:
Foo: 1. bar
2. Barrr
3. barrrx
Would yield 3 entries, with the definition field set separately (and the example sentence set separately as well). If there's no example sentence, the definition stays, but the ExSentence field is blank, or flagged somehow.
That might be faster than disambiguating a bunch of entries, or at least it would be a way to make sure you can cover the definitions of some of the more definition-heavy verbs.