Back

jmdict vs edict2

#2
I had a little trouble with this too. JMDict is the new format, so you should go with that. I think they were or perhaps still are updating EDICT2 in unison, but you can basically think of it as deprecated. There's a DTD for JMDict and a page explaining the relational data model they use themselves for JMdict somewhere on the site. 

It took me quite a bit of work to parse it successfully into a DB, but then I was using a fairly low-level Java library. There are a lot of elements, so I'd study the DTD and the data model page before writing any code. Since JMdict is a relatively new format, the Bibliography, Link and Audit tags are currently completely empty, so I wouldn't prioritise those for now. 

If you're making a J-E dictionary, you'll probably be interested in Kanjidic2, the Tanaka Corpus, Kradile-u (check license), KanjiVG, and some kind of radical list (I had to make my own).
Reply

Messages In This Thread
jmdict vs edict2 - by yogert909 - 2016-06-10, 8:43 pm
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by jimeux - 2016-06-10, 9:25 pm
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by Roketzu - 2016-06-11, 4:08 am
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by pm215 - 2016-06-11, 8:44 am
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by Roketzu - 2016-06-11, 9:23 am
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by jimeux - 2016-06-12, 5:45 am
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by Roketzu - 2016-06-12, 6:08 am
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by yogert909 - 2016-06-13, 1:00 pm
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by Roketzu - 2016-06-13, 2:35 pm
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by yogert909 - 2016-06-11, 2:43 am
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by anotherjohn - 2016-06-11, 4:46 am
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by Roketzu - 2016-06-11, 8:18 am
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by pm215 - 2016-06-11, 10:37 am
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by yogert909 - 2016-06-13, 2:44 pm
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by Roketzu - 2016-06-13, 3:36 pm
RE: jmdict vs edict2 - by Roketzu - 2016-06-13, 6:58 pm