SomeCallMeChris basically said it all. The book is for understanding grammar explanations, not reading practice, and after a while, romaji becomes way more difficult to read anyway. Finally, if you use the deck I linked to revise, you're not going to be remembering the romaji somehow, there's no romaji in the deck. So ultimately, there's really no reason to worry. While I read this series cover to cover, it's designed for reference mostly, so it makes sense that it has romaji, because that makes it far more useful to people with a linguistic interest in Japanese, who might not have it as a language they actually understand.
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Good grammar deck - by Bull007 - 2016-05-31, 10:16 am
RE: Good grammar deck - by SomeCallMeChris - 2016-05-31, 1:22 pm
RE: Good grammar deck - by NinKenDo - 2016-06-07, 4:39 am
RE: Good grammar deck - by Nukemarine - 2016-06-07, 5:02 am
RE: Good grammar deck - by NinKenDo - 2016-06-07, 5:08 am
RE: Good grammar deck - by debrucey - 2016-06-07, 6:03 am
RE: Good grammar deck - by tokyostyle - 2016-06-07, 10:53 am
RE: Good grammar deck - by NinKenDo - 2016-06-07, 7:10 am
RE: Good grammar deck - by debrucey - 2016-06-07, 8:22 am
RE: Good grammar deck - by SomeCallMeChris - 2016-06-07, 9:08 am
RE: Good grammar deck - by NinKenDo - 2016-06-07, 11:45 pm
|
