Back

Is it worth it to learn traditional characters?

#13
(2015-11-24, 1:07 pm)kameden Wrote: This is the deck. The first column is traditional, the second is simplified. If they are the same the second one is deleted.

https://mega.nz/#!OMlDFYZA!gSubvMyn5lxpA...2xNmp7TEtM
Glancing through, from 1 to 100, it is a pretty good deck you've got there.
The deck looks quite comprehensive with two types of pinyin sound as well.
The first column is traditional characters (Taiwan),
the second column is simplified characters (China).

Traditional characters [Hong Kong]
like 唔 and 佢 in Cantonese are not in the deck.
Japanese characters (more or less, close to the Chinese Hanzi meaning) in this color shade.

@ [Cantonese] 不 (ふ)   no; not (adverb) un*~~ / in*~~ / im*~~ (negative connotation)
@係 [Cantonese] 是 (ぜ)   1:right/agree with <a person> (此れ)2:this/these/such
@ [Cantonese] 彼 (かれ) he; him [pronoun]
@既 [Cantonese] ノ (の)   ~'s (possessive particle) auxiliary
Edited: 2015-11-25, 2:40 am
Reply

Messages In This Thread
RE: Is it worth it to learn traditional characters? - by eslang - 2015-11-25, 1:58 am