![]() |
|
Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - Printable Version +- kanji koohii FORUM (http://forum.koohii.com) +-- Forum: Learning Japanese (http://forum.koohii.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: The Japanese language (http://forum.koohii.com/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts (/thread-9712.html) |
Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - financialwar - 2012-08-03 I am currently organising my Anki Kanji flashcards according the 「日本語漢字能力漢検 級別漢字表」, in level 2 which tests the newly added 196 joyo kanji, there are two variations for some kanji and according to the footnote on the last page, the correct kanji is the one in the bracket [ ]. However, Japanese computer fonts (mincho, meiryo and others) can only display the variation outside the []. can anyone who recently taken the Kanken level 2 test tell me what should I do here? Copy of the 級別漢字表 can be obtained here http://www.kanken.or.jp/teido/pdf/national_list.pdf footnote: on the last page 日本漢字能力検定2〜10 級においては、「常用漢字表」およびこの「級別漢字表」に示された字体で書くこと。 また、「常用漢字表」に参考として示されている康こう煕き 字典体など、旧字体を用いると正答とは認められない。ただし、一部例外として、級別漢字表内の〔 〕内の字体は正答と認める。 Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - kitakitsune - 2012-08-03 There's only 20 of them. Don't worry about it. By the time you get to 2kyu you should be really damn good at kanji and will know that the computer font is obviously a traditional form and the correct form for the test is the modern forms that are used with the other 2000 kanji you learned before you got to that point. And there must be a font with the correct forms somewhere, I would look around for that. Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - imabi - 2012-08-03 Good luck. I'm studying for Level 1! It's going to take a lot of time...oh well. The Kanji that have come across...some are just so interesting. Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - Isbilenper - 2012-08-03 imabi Wrote:Good luck. I'm studying for Level 1! It's going to take a lot of time...oh well.Good luck, that sounds pretty hard! Out of pure curiosity, do you have/know of a somewhat official file like the one posted by financialwar but with the kanjis for level pre-1 and 1? Since I would probably like to take level 1 some decade or so in the future, it would be nice to get used to using the test-appropriate form right from when I add the kanjis to Anki to spare that time down the line (I add kanjis outside RtK1 as I run across them). Do they in general use modern forms as well for the level 1 and pre-1 (like the ones questioned by the OP) or do they stick more to the traditional forms there? Sorry about all the questions, but I couldn't find a lot about it in English and I can't really read Japanese yet, so I thought it might be worth asking. Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - kitakitsune - 2012-08-03 I imagine more traditional forms would appear in 1 and pre-1 because all of those kanji are outside of the government lists and thus the standardizations that occured to the joyo kanji after WWII do not apply to them. Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - imabi - 2012-08-03 Yes that's true. I actually have a site bookmarked on my iPad with tons of information to read through for the Kanken up to level 1. It's amazing. The site is http://www.geocities.jp/bunakobo/kanken1.html It's amazing what you can find when you google such characters though. It leads to many more great resources. I might start making blog posts on my own site, or here, about what I learn each day in preparation. Rare words, proverbs, etc. There's another one that I know of that I come across when researching characters for the test that is currently under construction. They add new information about a handful of Kanji every now and then. They haven't included every character that can potentially show up on the test, but they have a lot. I just don't know where it is right now. I'll investigate. Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - toshiromiballza - 2012-08-03 What's the reason for "(de-)simplifying" 稽 into (?) with 上 instead of 匕? Surely that's not right? Edit: seems they use the 上 form in Korea, but why is this form the "official" one in Japan, since 匕+日 are way more common?
Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - imabi - 2012-08-03 That really makes no sense to me either. I've always used 稽. I know it was included in the list because of words like 稽古 Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - imabi - 2012-08-03 Personally, I don't know why they had to get rid of 5 characters. I understand 銑, but I kind of like 匁. 璽 is more useless than 膨. It took them way too long to include characters like 岡. Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - Isbilenper - 2012-08-03 imabi Wrote:The site is http://www.geocities.jp/bunakobo/kanken1.htmlThanks a lot, the lists on this site are exactly what I was looking for. =) Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - imabi - 2012-08-03 Great! Let me know what you learn from it! I like the fact that there are just so many sentences with the characters actually used. Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - kazeatari - 2012-08-05 toshiromiballza Wrote:What's the reason for "(de-)simplifying" 稽 into http://i46.tinypic.com/124eagm.png (?) with 上 instead of 匕? Surely that's not right? Edit: seems they use the 上 form in Korea, but why is this form the "official" one in Japan, since 匕+日 are way more common?The first one, the one with 匕 , IS the official one (in the jouyou kanji list), the other one is just tolerated (as handwritten form). You can check this on the official list (you can download the pdf here) In the pdf you can find some notes about it and some other examples of official shinjitai, kyuujitai, unofficial shinjitai (ryakuji) and tolerated forms (most "famous" issues being 頰 vs 頬, 剝 vs 剥 and 塡 vs 填 'cause the jis form of each of them isn't even listed as an official 字体 while their official jitai is in unicode but not in jis). Btw here you can find some other problematic kanji...
Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - toshiromiballza - 2012-08-05 Ah, I see. This will only confuse things (and already does), unless the Ministry decides to simplify them, like they did many years ago. Here is a funny post by Jim Breen regarding this: Quote:A Tale of Two Kanji (or Perhaps Only One Kanji)(Taken from http://www.joyokanji.com/status-updates/turning-other-cheek) Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - kazeatari - 2012-08-06 Yeah, actually when I first found out there was a problem with tagaini jisho, I ended up telling Jim Breen about this issue with kanjidic2 (where 頬 appears to be a jouyou kanji, while it isn't) and he explained the whole matter to me replying to my mail and then decided to write that post. Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - warakawa - 2012-08-18 kazeatari Wrote:Yeah, actually when I first found out there was a problem with tagaini jisho, I ended up telling Jim Breen about this issue with kanjidic2 (where 頬 appears to be a jouyou kanji, while it isn't) and he explained the whole matter to me replying to my mail and then decided to write that post.what are you talking about, 頬 is a jouyou kanji? Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - toshiromiballza - 2012-08-18 warakawa Wrote:what are you talking about, 頬 is a jouyou kanji?Read the two posts above his. Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - warakawa - 2012-08-18 toshiromiballza Wrote:exactly what I mean, that post supports the fact that 頬 is a jouyou kanjiwarakawa Wrote:what are you talking about, 頬 is a jouyou kanji?Read the two posts above his. Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - JimmySeal - 2012-08-18 No, it clearly says that 頰 is joyo kanji and 頬 is not. I guess it's up to Jim Breen whether he wants to mark (simplified/Asahi-ized/all) variants of joyo kanji as joyo kanji, but I think most people would agree that neither 讀 nor the following character are joyo kanji:
Kanken level 2 kanji and computer fonts - laug91 - 2012-08-26 To the OP: you misunderstood the footnote. This is what is says: The Kanji Kentei is based on the forms listed in the official Joyo kanji list (these are listed, non-bracketed, on the pdf). Other forms, including Kangxi dictionary forms or forms listed as Kyujitai in the official list will not be accepted as correct answers. However, as an exception (例外) to this rule, the forms listed in brackets on this pdf will also be considered as correct answers for the purpose of this test. TL;DR all forms in that pdf, whether or not in brackets, are considered correct for the test up to 2kyu. |