![]() |
|
J Test compared to JLPT - Printable Version +- kanji koohii FORUM (http://forum.koohii.com) +-- Forum: Learning Japanese (http://forum.koohii.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: JLPT, Jobs & College in Japan (http://forum.koohii.com/forum-12.html) +--- Thread: J Test compared to JLPT (/thread-7722.html) |
J Test compared to JLPT - NoSleepTilFluent - 2011-04-24 Does anybody know anything about the J Test and how it compares to JLPT. I'm interested if a lot of companies in Japan recognize the test as a measure of your Japanese ability. Here's the english site: http://j-test.jp/xp/modules/tinyd10/content/index.php?id=11 The lower level seems completely useless. But the upper level classifies your ability into grades and says if you can get in the 900-1000 range you are on the level of an interpreter. This is my first time hearing of it. J Test compared to JLPT - JimmySeal - 2011-04-24 http://www.jref.com/forum/showthread.php?t=24181 Be sure to check out the link in post 15. I wouldn't know anything about companies' recognition of it. My guess is that it's a lot less known than the JLPT among employers. J Test compared to JLPT - kitakitsune - 2011-04-24 It is worthless to take unless you are looking for personal satisfaction. The JLPT is the government approved gold standard among companies and universities interested in working with foreigners. J Test compared to JLPT - Jarvik7 - 2011-04-25 Nothing is worthless. Having two certifications on your resume looks better than one, even if you have to explain what it is in an interview. However, I would recommend taking BJT instead. It is more widely recognized than JTEST, is harder than JLPT1 to get the top level, and is directly applicable to working in a Japanese office environment (it's more a test of applying Japanese than a test OF Japanese). RE: JTEST levels Even getting 100% is NOWHERE near enough to be an interpreter, but it is slightly harder than JLPT1 at the top end. |