![]() |
|
Love in Japan... - Printable Version +- kanji koohii FORUM (http://forum.koohii.com) +-- Forum: Learning Japanese (http://forum.koohii.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: General discussion (http://forum.koohii.com/forum-8.html) +--- Thread: Love in Japan... (/thread-3512.html) |
Love in Japan... - liosama - 2009-07-18 Do you masturbate at least? Love in Japan... - blackmacros - 2009-07-18 liosama Wrote:Do you masturbate at least?Who me? All the time! Its my favourite hobby after hop scotch. ...what, wait, you weren't asking me huh? Love in Japan... - Aijin - 2009-07-18 I think the question was directed towards Mary. Careful, guys, Mary has mace and she knows how to use it. Quote:Stop it. You're already someone who's learned English to what appears to be perfect fluency. If you also go quoting Star Wars on a regular basis, I may have to develop an e-crush.Hah Unfortunately I've only seen the movies once, so I can't do much quoting. I'm more of an Oscar-Wilde-Quoting-Girl.
Love in Japan... - QuackingShoe - 2009-07-18 Back to Tobberoth then. HiS eNgLiSh Is So DrEaMy Love in Japan... - TheTrueBlue - 2009-07-18 blackmacros Wrote:I can't be bothered searching through this thread but you've said a couple of times " I have more experience than the Average Joe". I'm sorry but if that doesn't imply that you had a large number of sexual encounters to 'practice' for your dream girl then I don't know what does. Mary was a logical extension of that to demonstrate my point.Very well, I can see why she appeared a logical extension. blackmacros Wrote:Nothing in my description violates your guidelines of kind, sweet, caring, intelligent girl. So if you don't want her, there must be something else you want? Purity perhaps?If you refer back to where I set down the full list of things I'm looking for here: http://forum.koohii.com/showthread.php?tid=3512&page=6 it's about halfway down the screen. Nowhere do I list "purity," as if such an absolute thing existed or could be appreciably measured in any but the broadest terms, I want someone who is young in certain ways, and I later wrote numerous times that those ways are the same as my own. Nowhere in that is there anything like purity that is beyond what's ascribable to myself. If I wanted purity that bad I'd be making plans to infiltrate an abbey and kidnap a nun instead of going to Japan. blackmacros Wrote:Purity and experience are mutually exclusive.This is a logical fallacy based on a faulty premise. Again, my own stance. And again, I'm not even looking for "purity". And since you continue to bring up this hyperbolic perfect girl scenario: My perfect girl and me are living together happily now that we've met. ================================================================= Aijin Wrote:TrueBlue: That makes sense, but I am just wondering, how will you know that the girl you first have full-on sex with will be the girl you want to spend the rest of your life with?Because I wouldn't be having sex with her if I didn't want to spend the rest of my life with her. Aijin Wrote:Relationships change tremendously based on circumstances. Casually dating someone is nothing like living with them, which is nothing like being married and having kids with them. People may exist in a relationship happily in one situation, but when transported to the next, their relationship collapses into a cesspool of misery.I agree, a risk I acknowledge and do take. Aijin Wrote:I am just saying, it's impossible to ever know. I was 100% convinced I would spend the rest of my life with my first love, yet in retrospect I realize it never would have worked out. Emotions are capricious, while love is capricious and cruel. You just can't ever tell, if you know what I mean.I'm sorry for what you went through. I've had similar conversations with old college professors of mine about the marriages they've had. Each of the previous ones was also "Love to the End! For all time! I swear! Here's the ring that proves it!" Aijin Wrote:Of course, if you're okay with that, then there's no problem. Like I said, your goal isn't impossible, I don't think anyone is saying that it is.Haha if only you read and felt the flames directed at me, you'd think I wanted to fix the U.S. economy by robbing Fort Knox or something. Aijin Wrote:Relationships like that do happen. I just think most of us want you to be able to find happiness in other relationships if your dream falls short. I mean, will you abandon your quest after a while?Yes, as I've written, if it doesn't work out in Japan, I can always go to the mainland. Or somewhere else. Aijin Wrote:If you search for 6 years for this dream girl, never find anyone close, then find a girl that takes your breath away, but the minor detail is she's had sex before, would you still go for her?If she takes my breath away, and I'm freaking on the verge of the big Three-O, (cf. the Gatsby quote I posted earlier) then I really don't know. That would be a damned hard choice to make, and I'm glad I don't have to make it now. Although at 2 or 3 years into the "quest" as you wrote it, I'd have to seriously consider such a scenario. liosama Wrote:Do you masturbate at least?Uhh, if it's directed at Mary, then from her "character profile", I'd say you can safely bet on it. As for me, I'm just like other young guys in that regard. Love in Japan... - magamo - 2009-07-18 @TheTrueBlue Every girl shlicks. No exceptions. Love in Japan... - Aijin - 2009-07-18 Shlicks...? Don't use terms I don't know, gosh. Love in Japan... - liosama - 2009-07-18 I was asking Trueblue But it's nice to hear from others too
Love in Japan... - TheTrueBlue - 2009-07-18 magamo Wrote:@TheTrueBlueSo I've heard from many people, it's one of the better things men and women have in common. Shlick = Fap Love in Japan... - QuackingShoe - 2009-07-18 magamo Wrote:shlicksI have a new favourite word. Edit: Shlick isn't fap! Girls can't fap. That wouldn't make any sense! Love in Japan... - blackmacros - 2009-07-18 TrueBlue Wrote:I want someone to live life with, I don't want a woman who's so experienced and mature and established that she's kind of already found a place in life to situate herself within.So I looked at your list and I believe this is the only thing that disqualifies poor old Mary, if you take 'experienced' to also mean sexually [although I never described Mary as having already found her place in the world]. I also believe it disqualifies you (you do keep going on about your experience after all). So my point still stands. Other than that, Mary still fits all the points on your list. Love in Japan... - Aijin - 2009-07-18 Shlick = masturbate??? I've never heard that one. I have mixed feelings on if it's a word I should add to my English vocabulary ![]() Well, there actually are some women who don't even masturbate, for whatever reason. Rare, but they're out there. Love in Japan... - TheTrueBlue - 2009-07-18 blackmacros Wrote:I take experienced to mean many things, not just sex. But even in sexual experienceTrueBlue Wrote:I want someone to live life with, I don't want a woman who's so experienced and mature and established that she's kind of already found a place in life to situate herself within.So I looked at your list and I believe this is the only thing that disqualifies poor old Mary, if you take 'experienced' to also mean sexually [although I never described Mary as having already found her place in the world]. I also believe it disqualifies you (you do keep going on about your experience after all). she does not fit everything on my list because she doesn't have comparable amounts of sexual experience to myself. Mary doesn't fit, I'm not disqualified, and your point does not stand. You are exaggerating my sexual experience and hers in your examples. And we don't know enough about to Mary to say if she fits all the other things I'm looking for. Love in Japan... - Burritolingus - 2009-07-18 Aijin Wrote:Shlick = masturbate??? I've never heard that one. I have mixed feelings on if it's a word I should add to my English vocabularyIt's simply the logical, onomatopoeic counterpart to "fap", of course! Which is standard 4chan terminology, and why you really probably should not add it to your English vocabulary. Ever. And this applies to everyone, native speakers and otherwise. Also, I'm gonna start writing my Mary fanfic right now, because this thread has inspired me in ways thought possible only by war heroes and the triumphant physically disabled. As long as we believe in her, Mary will live on in our hearts forever. I think I'll call it, "Mary and the Seven Enchanted Dongs" Love in Japan... - TheTrueBlue - 2009-07-18 Burritolingus Wrote:Well as long as she stays in Japan, I guess it might be appropriate for this thread... o.0Aijin Wrote:Shlick = masturbate??? I've never heard that one. I have mixed feelings on if it's a word I should add to my English vocabularyIt's simply the logical, onomatopoeic counterpart to "fap", of course! Which is standard 4chan terminology, and why you really probably should not add it to your English vocabulary. Ever. And this applies to everyone, native speakers and otherwise. Love in Japan... - blackmacros - 2009-07-18 TheTrueBlue Wrote:You are exaggerating my sexual experience and hers in your examples.If I'm exaggerating your sexual experiences you've only got yourself to blame. The only thing I'm basing my assumptions on is what you've told us of your sexual experience. Mary's experience has been exaggerated, on purpose. It is a logical extension of the comments you have made to show you why and where your reasoning about virginity breaks down. Would it be acceptable if she had done these acts with only half the village? A quarter? Two or three? The same amount of people as you've had experiences with? Mary is a virgin after all, and perfect for you in every other regard*, but you've rejected her (and broken her heart might I add). If you answer is "I reject Mary if she has done that with the whole village" but "its ok with 2 or 3 people, or the same amount of people as me" then you're logic is inconsistent, which is the point I'm trying to make. If your answer is "I reject Mary if she has done that with anyone at all" then, logically, your perfect woman would also reject you (and it makes you a hypocrite). So, which is it? Logical inconsistency on your behalf, or a hypocrite? *Take it as given that Mary is the perfect woman for you in all the other points that you mentioned in that list. Burritolingus Wrote:Mary fanfic for the mother ***** win.Aijin Wrote:Shlick = masturbate??? I've never heard that one. I have mixed feelings on if it's a word I should add to my English vocabularyIt's simply the logical, onomatopoeic counterpart to "fap", of course! Which is standard 4chan terminology, and why you really probably should not add it to your English vocabulary. Ever. And this applies to everyone, native speakers and otherwise. /win Love in Japan... - nadiatims - 2009-07-18 Me thinks thinks Mary deserves a lot better than thetrueblue. Love in Japan... - TheTrueBlue - 2009-07-19 blackmacros Wrote:Actually I believe the a priori notions that I'm some kind of male whore who doesn't deserve a "pure" girl that I suspect are being harbored in you are the cause. So I blame you for your own exaggerations. Or I would, if there was a reason to assign any blame.TheTrueBlue Wrote:You are exaggerating my sexual experience and hers in your examples.If I'm exaggerating your sexual experiences you've only got yourself to blame. blackmacros Wrote:The only thing I'm basing my assumptions on is what you've told us of your sexual experience.And your own biases and beliefs. blackmacros Wrote:Mary's experience has been exaggerated, on purpose.No shit. blackmacros Wrote:It is a logical extension of the comments you have made to show you why and where your reasoning about virginity breaks down.Oh it breaks down does it? Let's see what you wrote now. blackmacros Wrote:Would it be acceptable if she had done these acts with only half the village? A quarter? Two or three?How big is the village? blackmacros Wrote:The same amount of people as you've had experiences with?Sure. blackmacros Wrote:Mary is a virgin after all, and perfect for you in every other regard*, but you've rejected her (and broken her heart might I add).She's not perfect for me in every other regard. If this fantastical character you've decided to employ fits those characters, then describe as such, one at a time. That people can see how unlikely such a person is, if nothing else. blackmacros Wrote:If you answer is "I reject Mary if she has done that with the whole village" but "its ok with 2 or 3 people, or the same amount of people as me" then you're logic is inconsistent, which is the point I'm trying to make.My logic is not inconsistent, in the former case, by all appearances she has way more sexual experience than me, while in the latter, it's fine. blackmacros Wrote:If your answer is "I reject Mary if she has done that with anyone at all" then, logically, your perfect woman would also reject you (and it makes you a hypocrite).No I wouldn't reject her. Your case doesn't stand. blackmacros Wrote:So, which is it? Logical inconsistency on your behalf, or a hypocrite?Thank you for personally insulting me. It clearly reveals your own bias against me. I'm not a hypocrite nor am I being logically inconsistent. And continuing this exaggerated "perfect" girl nonsense, and I've never used the word perfect. I haven't rejected her, we're enjoying our new life together, and I'm glad I ignored all the doubters, nay-sayers, trolls, internet tough guys, and other people who tried to keep me from the wonderful life I now have. blackmacros Wrote:*Take it as given that Mary is the perfect woman for you in all the other points that you mentioned in that list.Go ahead, write her up then. I've already refuted your entire case anyway. While you're at it, go ahead and edit out that mistaken "\win" you put in. Unless it's just your fervent appreciation for Mary and the Seven Dongs. @nadiatims Well, you are sorely mistaken. Please dump your venom elsewhere. Love in Japan... - QuackingShoe - 2009-07-19 Burritolingus Wrote:Also, I'm gonna start writing my Mary fanfic right now, because this thread has inspired me in ways thought possible only by war heroes and the triumphant physically disabled. As long as we believe in her, Mary will live on in our hearts forever. I think I'll call it, "Mary and the Seven Enchanted Dongs"E-mail me when you're finished <3 Love in Japan... - blackmacros - 2009-07-19 TheTrueBlue Wrote:She's not perfect for me in every other regard. If this fantastical character you've decided to employ fits those characters, then describe as such, one at a time. That people can see how unlikely such a person is, if nothing else.Ok this is Mary: Quote:- Like in wedding vows, I'd want someone who I can be really affectionate with and cherish. I've heard of the stigma against バカップル, but in private, if a girl doesn't like a guy who's romantic and physically intimate (スキンシップ) and I've met plenty who don't like the mushy stuff, then she's not going to be suitable.Mary possesses all these attributes, the ones that you pointed me to and specifically requested of a woman. The whole sum of Mary is this. This and her aforementioned sexual-but-non-penetrative-experiences. Notice the bolded section, which I've already mentioned as the only thing that disqualifies her. You say its ok if she has had as much sexual experience as you, or less. Quote:Therefore the same applies for this perfect woman searching for you. You will only be acceptable to her if you have the same amount of experience she does, or less. This will result in a scenario in which you both have the exact same sexual experience. And given that you have described yourself as quite experienced, I don't see how this is compatible with your desire (re the bolded section above) for a non-experienced woman.blackmacros Wrote:The same amount of people as you've had experiences with?Sure. And yes, the /win was in relation to the awesome-ness of Mary fanfic. Love in Japan... - TheTrueBlue - 2009-07-19 It's good that you acknowledge by omission that your prior case was baseless. You are confusing "quite experienced" with sleeping with a whole village. Here is the bottom line: I've been with 8 girls now. All we did was the equivalent of high schoolers petting. Here is what my girl says to me: "I've been with 8 guys, and we did all kinds of things. They touched me in certain places, and we gave each other pleasure. But I didn't go all the way with any of them. Do you accept me?" Yes I do. Love in Japan... - Ampharos64 - 2009-07-19 TheTrueBlue Wrote:After all, every school or workplace has their share of anti-social outcasts, both male and female. And some of those people lessen in their anipathy or awkwardness as they grow and adjust into adults. Hopefully I can meet someone who's decided to give social interactions a second chance, that maybe people aren't as awful as those bullies who 苛め’d her back in high school.If she's like that (and she might have to be), I warn you, as a social outcast myself, she's not going to be that well adjusted, and I would say that an intense relationship will not necessarily help. Very sad story, Aijin. Maybe Amour Vincit Omnia (love conquers all), but I also wouldn't like to depend on another person's presence for my happiness that much, and would want to depend on the 'happily ever after' ideal even less. Can work, I'm sure, but it's not something I would want to wait and hope for, more something that might find me (though as I said, I personally am not really wanting it to, books and kitties ftw). I said before that it's probably impossible to accept someone as they are because there's almost certain to be at least one thing about the person that drives you nuts, that's just human. Good Gatsby quote, btw (though, they don't work out...). Since you're not approaching thirty just yet, would honestly say it might be better to try not to worry too much, and see what happens for a bit (in Japan, if you want). Love in Japan... - dat5h - 2009-07-19 hmmm, well ... do you know the rule of threes?
Love in Japan... - dat5h - 2009-07-19 Musashi Wrote:Hey, I just noticed this, sorry to be so late. Ya, nukemarine was right in his interpretation, but your interpretation is not baseless. The problem is that I was too vague. I only said "statistically" and assumed that the large population of China could speak for itself. My apologies. I didn't mean to imply any difference in foreigner aproval by any country, simply a large numbers game. Cheersdat5h Wrote:Just gonna pop in here a moment and point out that statistically, you are far better off going to China if you want to find this girl. Just a thoughtGosh, what is this: go there and there to have a better chance of finding a girl? Can't find one in your own area? It sounds almost like you're promoting, yeah go to China because it's easy to find a girl since they'd think ur rich (in fact not rich and usually ugly) and western, and you couldn't find one in ur own country anyways.
Love in Japan... - blackmacros - 2009-07-19 TheTrueBlue Wrote:It's good that you acknowledge by omission that your prior case was baseless.Erm...I'm still making the same case. Your logic is inconsistent as I have been pointing out. Quote:And given that you have described yourself as quite experienced, I don't see how this is compatible with your desire (re the bolded section above) for a non-experienced woman.And if your logic is not inconsistent then you are a hypocrite because you are not willing to accept in your woman that which you have already done yourself. Quote:Here is what my girl says to me:Ok and now lets change this. to "I've been with 9 guys". And now "10 guys", then "11". And so on. At what point do you say no? At 9? That seems a bit silly to me. What difference does just one more make? According to your current list of requirements there should be no distinction between 8 guys and 9 guys (And therefore no distinction between 9 and 10. and 10 and 11. and so on) other than your ever changing, self referential measurement of "no more than me". What if it takes you 20 years to find this girl, and you've been with 100 women by then? Is a girl who has been with 100 men acceptable then, but not right now since you've only been with 8? Is there a line at which she moves from "virgin but acceptable" to "virgin but unacceptable"? There's nothing wrong with hypocrisy, nor with logical inconsistencies, they are a part of everyday life. But its important to analyse them and understand *why* we continue to sustain them. I don't believe you have done that. |